Laserfiche WebLink
Dick Putnam <br /> January 29, 1996 <br /> Page 3 <br /> In conclusion, it is the City staft's position that had you replaced the pre-existin� deck under the <br /> permit issued in 1988 and as part of your home remodeling/additions at that time, such deck <br /> reconstruction would have been covered under that variance and that deck permit. I-Iowever, <br /> replacement of the deck five years later after tlie original permit was finaled, is considered a new <br /> project that requires a new permit as well as hardcover variance approval before that permit can be <br /> issued. Staff does not have the authority to deal with hardcover trade-offs when the property is over <br /> the hardcover limits. Such h�ade-offs, even for mere replacement of existing structures, rec�uirc tllat <br /> tlie variance procedure be followed. <br /> Because the deck you built in 1994 appears to match that which was approved in 1987, we could <br /> reasonably consider taking in the variance application as a renewal. Part of your submittal would <br /> have to be an updated hardcover survey by a certified surveyor. <br /> My recommendation is that you file the appropriate after-the-flct variance application for <br /> replacement of the deck. If you have further questions, please contact me or Jeanne Mabusth at 473- <br /> 7357. <br /> Sincerely, � <br /> ./ <br /> .��� / �../�� �"�� <br /> /� <br /> " / <br /> v(�% <br /> Michacl P. Gaffron <br /> Assistant Planning and 'Loning Administrator <br /> MPG/lsv <br /> cc: Jcanne Mabusth, 13uilding & Loning Administrator <br /> Lyle Oinan, Building Otficial <br /> Bruce Vang, Field Inspector <br /> Encl. a) Exhibit B, Resolution#2254 as approved by Council <br /> b) Plans submitted for "Deck Extension and Screen Porch Addition", 1988 <br /> c) Survey showing pre-existing deck <br /> d) Pinal inspcction slip 6/26/89 <br />