Laserfiche WebLink
� ` . . <br /> . . <br /> . .#:,� Cit� of ORONO <br /> • ��� . <br /> r� <br /> ;�* <br /> � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> '�� ~ 1726 <br /> ;�.=N-- NO: � <br /> r`.� � � ', <br /> .J . <br /> ' � � � A RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE TO <br /> MLJNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 � <br /> FILE NO. 881 <br /> WHEREAS, Krutzig Custom Homes, . Inc., a Minnesota <br /> corporation, (hereinafter "the Applicant" ) is owner of the <br /> property located at 1629 Bohn's Point Road within the City of <br /> Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: <br /> Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 565, Hennepin County, � <br /> Minnesota (hereinafter "Property" ) ; and <br /> WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a <br /> variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2, <br /> � to permit the construction of decks, sidewalk, and driveway which <br /> would increase the hardcover from 3 ,950 square feet or 21� to � <br /> 5,950 square feet or, 31.5� in the 75' to 250' setback zone where <br /> only 25� or 4,725 square feet of hardcover is allowed; and ; <br /> • WHEREAS , the City Council has considered this ' <br /> . application including the findings and recommendations of the <br /> Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the owner <br /> and effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and . <br /> welfare of the community. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of <br /> Orono, Minnesota, hereby. �denies the application of Krutzig Custom <br /> Homes , Inc. for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section <br /> 10.22 , Subdivision 2 for the property legally described above, <br /> based on one or more of the following findings : <br /> l. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application � <br /> on November 19 , 1984 and recommended denial of the <br /> application based on the following findings: � <br /> a) Applicant was made fully aware by City staff of the <br /> hardcover limitations on the property at the time of <br /> application for a building permit. <br /> b) The lot is substandard in area and width in the LR- <br /> 1B Zoning District in which it is located; however, the � <br /> property is substantially large enough that it could be � <br /> developed within the hardcover limitations. <br /> • c) The additional hardcover requested is not necessary • <br /> to preserve a substantial property right of the owner, <br /> and the conditions leading to the need for a variance <br /> were created by the applicant. <br /> page 1 of �4 <br />