My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Inspections, ltrs, minutes re boathse deck
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
C
>
Casco Point Road
>
2659 Casco Point Road - 20-117-23-23-0022
>
Correspondence
>
Inspections, ltrs, minutes re boathse deck
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 3:54:04 PM
Creation date
3/10/2016 12:13:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
2659
Street Name
Casco Point
Street Type
Road
Address
2659 Casco Point Road
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
2011723230022
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, October 20, 2003 <br /> ' 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#S) #02-2858 SCOTT STANDA, 2659 CASCO POINT ROAD, Continued <br /> Mabusth questioned whether the LMCD would have an issue with the s�-ucture protruding <br /> over the water. <br /> Gaffron stated that the LMCD may want to look at it if the posts are at or belo«�the <br /> OHWL. <br /> If this application had come before the Commission before the fact, Mabusth asked the <br /> Commission what they would have allowed. She noted that she would have asked for the <br /> removal of the slab. <br /> Hawn questioned whether they would have approved a deck on an accessory structure, and <br /> an even bigger deck tfian previously attached to this nonconforming structure. She asked <br /> whether it was the Commission's intent to do away with these structures altogether. Hawn <br /> asked what record the City has of the previous deck size. <br /> While he felt that he probably would not have allowed it, Rahn stated that it was not out of <br /> character of what is currently in the neighborhood. <br /> Mr. Standa stated that the deck has always been on the structure. <br /> Gaffron agreed that, to everyone's knowledge, the deck had always been there. He noted <br /> that research could be done to find the original paperwork. <br /> Rahn maintained that the cantilevered portion was new, and asked the applicant consider a <br /> straight replacement, without the cantilever, and minimum landing. <br /> Mr. Standa stated that he would like a deck to allow for safe exit from the slidinQ doors <br /> that have always been there as well. y <br /> There was no public comment. <br /> Fritzler suggested the applicant remove the sliding doors and replace them with a solid <br /> window. <br /> Mabusth stated that she believed the applicant should be allowed some kind of access <br /> platform out of the doors, for safety sake, adding that a second exit is beneficial. <br /> Rahn noted that two accesses are not mandatory. � <br /> In light of the removals, Mabusth stated that she felt a 4' platform was a fair compromise. <br /> Page 5 of 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.