Laserfiche WebLink
-. . . . . _ -. � .- . .. . ... <br /> t � r <br /> $ �� <br /> Clt of ORONO <br /> � <br /> • � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � NO. 1645 <br /> • ' • • � � <br /> RESOLDTION TO WITHDRAW A REQUEST FOR A PUBI�IC HEARING ON <br /> NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT #MN0024091 <br /> FOR THE MAPLE PLAIN WASTEWATER TRL�ATMENT PLANT <br /> Wher•eas, assurances have been made by the Metropolitan <br /> Council, Pollution Control Agency, and Metropolitan Waste Control <br /> Commission that the Orono Comprehensive Plan will not be compromised <br /> and that service hookups to the Maple Plain-Long Lake-Orono <br /> Interceptor will not be allowed by Orono citizens; and <br /> Whereas, it is the City Council' s understanding that the <br /> • construction of the Maple Plain-Long Lake-Orono Interceptor will not <br /> incur any assessments to the City of Orono or any of its citizens; and <br /> • Whereas, the Maple Plain-Long Lake-Orono Interceptor is <br /> being constructed to solve an immediate problem (outdated treatment <br /> plant in Maple Plain and resultant phosphorous load into Painters <br /> Creek/Jennings Bay) and not to generate leap frog development in the <br /> rural area of Orono; and . <br /> Whereas, the City of Orono, through its adopted <br /> Comprehensive Plan, which in turn was approved and accepted by the <br /> . Metropolitan Council can maintain its governmental ability to <br /> � determine rate and type of development in the rural area affected by the <br /> interceptor and determine and maintain development standards; and . <br /> Whereas, it is unlikely that additional expenditures in <br /> opposition of the interceptor will accomplish a reconsideration of the <br /> - alternatives. <br /> Now, Therefore, Be it Resolved that the City Council of the <br /> City of Orono• does direct the City Administrator to inform the <br /> Minnesota Pollution Control Agency of our intent to withdraw our <br /> request for a public hearing on the NPDES permit for the Maple Plain <br /> Wastewater Treatment Plant. <br /> Now, Therefore, Be it Further Resolved, to reconsider the <br /> motion by Adams/Hammerel of May 30, 1984, authorizing $6,000 funding <br /> for the preparation and presentation of the contested case hearing of <br /> Orono vs Minnesota Pol�ution Control Agency on the Maple Plain-Long <br /> � Lake-Orono Interceptor. <br /> � <br />