My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 1623
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 1600 - 1699 ( February 13, 1984 - November 26, 1984)
>
Resolution 1623
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2016 11:43:31 AM
Creation date
3/10/2016 11:43:31 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
, �y � ' <br /> Ci.t� o� ORONO <br /> r � . . . <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> NO. 1623 <br /> • . <br /> • � • • <br /> , 3 . The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application � <br /> on April 16 , 1984, and recommended denial of the proposed <br /> variances based upon the following findings : <br /> a) The proposed structure and apron will increase the net <br /> hardcover in the 75-250 ' setback area by 4080 square feet to <br /> approximately 65 percent. <br /> _ b) No concurrent reduction of hardcover is proposed by <br /> the applicant. <br /> 4. The proposed structure would not have an adverse effect <br /> on Lake Minnetonka if an area of existing hardcover equal to <br /> the area of the proposed structure, in the 0-75 ' setback � <br /> area, is concurrently removed. <br /> 5. The following hardships in locating the proposed <br /> structure to meeting the required 50 ' side yard setback have <br /> • been demonstrated by the applicantc <br /> a) Location of existing mature tr�es. <br /> b) Location of existing permanently installed dry-stack boat <br /> • storage racks which cannot be feasibly relocated due to grade <br /> and access requirements. <br /> c) Topography (slope near North Shore Drive right of way) . . <br /> d) Location of existing Metropolitan Waste Control <br /> Commission (MWCC) sewer lines across center of property. <br /> e) Location of existing parking configuration. <br /> 6 . The C�ity Council has considered . this application <br /> including the findings and recommendations of the Planning <br /> ' Commission, reports by City staff , comments by the applicant <br /> and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety <br /> and welfare of the community. <br /> � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.