Laserfiche WebLink
' � ltem#11-CCAgenda-12'08'201�{ <br /> � Frle,'�I�f-3697/7btalYages 11-1/ <br /> � <br /> I <br /> square feet (0.39 acre) acre in area and has 47 feet in width at the OHWL and 64 feet at <br /> the 75-foot setback. <br /> 3) The Property is located in Tier 1 of Orono's Stormwater Quaiity Overlay District and is <br /> limited to 25% hardcover based on gross lot area. <br /> 4) The second story additions to the home are proposed ta be�constructed over the existing <br /> footprint of the home. The variance to allow construt�ptt above the existing footprint of <br /> the home within the 10 foot side setback will allevi�t��practical difficulty inherent to the <br /> Property's width and not created by the Applicanf�.' ` <br /> 5) Regarding the side and rear setback variances, the Applicat�fs' request is in harmony <br /> with the purpose and intent of the ordina�. ' <br /> 6) Regarding the side and rear setback vari�nC�s, the;�pplicants' prz�}�r>sal is consistent <br /> with the comprehensive plan. <br /> 7) The City Council finds that the �ttndi�fems existing t�:this Property are peculiar to it and <br /> da not apply generally to other properE3r tn this zonirrg:district; that granting the setback <br /> variances for the 2"d story additian over th� �arage wpu� not adversely affect traffic <br /> conditions, light, air nor pose a fire h�ard or othex dangerfir� �eighboring property; wauld <br /> not merely serve es a cc�enience �Ga ;the �#pp�icenfi�; buf�s necessary to alleviate a <br /> practical difficu�tyF i� neces�t�y to pres�rd���ubstanti�F�roperty right of the Applicants; <br /> and would be in k�e�ping with#t�e spirit anc�i�tent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive <br /> Plan of the City. <br /> 8} With regar�s'#a the prt�pQ�ed deck, Rosolut�in No. 4640, adopted in 2001, granted <br /> v�irf�nces to the t�raperty r��arding the B #oot side setback for the garage, the side <br /> setb�ick variance albuvtng the�+�cond story and permitted 2,961 square feet (17.4% as <br /> adju�4ed based on currsnt lat a��� cafculations) of structural coverage. The approval <br /> allowec�ftx the Property:t� continu� � exceed the 15% structural limitation; however an <br /> increase i�r 9tructural cove��qe was not approved at that time. <br /> 9) As part of the a�+roval gr��i�d via Resolution No. 4640 a 750 square foot lakeside deck <br /> was removed and a 196 square foot screen porch was constructed in its place. <br /> 10)Granting of a variance for the proposed deck to permit additional structural coverage or <br /> massing on this Property above the allowed 15% and approved level of 17.4% is <br /> inconsistent with the goals and policies contained within the 2000-2030 Orono <br /> Community Management Plan. <br /> Page 4 of 7 <br />