Laserfiche WebLink
♦ S ' <br /> ♦ � ` � � <br /> Cit� of tJRONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCiI <br /> � <br /> NO. 1254 <br /> � � <br /> g} A plumbing permit would have been required in <br /> 1971 for a11 work on sewer and water lines. <br /> h) There is no record of a State permit for the <br /> electrical work. <br /> i) Neighbors and former building inspector attest <br /> �:he boat house structure was to be a single-story <br /> structure capped with a deck. <br /> j ) The State Building Code requires th� inspection of <br /> tYae various phases of construction and there is no <br /> record of any except that the farmer buildinq <br /> inspector states he remembers inspecting a single- <br /> story structure that he assumed was completed. <br /> 24 . The granting of the required variances would result <br /> in the following violat�.ons af Section 32. 340 of <br /> the zoning code with which the applicant must first <br /> comply before the required variance can be granted: <br /> a) The variances would have an adverse effect upon <br /> the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> b) The value of surrounding properties will be <br /> adversely affected. <br /> c) There are no speciai conditions applying to <br /> the land in question which are peculiar to <br /> the land or immediately adjoining property. <br /> d) The granting of the application is not necessary <br /> for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial <br /> property right of the applicant. <br /> e) The granting of the variances would impair the <br /> health, safety, comfort and be contrary to the <br /> intent of the zoning code and Comprehensive Plan. <br /> f) The granting of the variances will serve merely as <br /> a convenience to the applicant, and is not necessary <br /> to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. <br /> g) The granting of the variances would be adverse <br /> to the regulations of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed <br /> District. <br /> PAGE 5 OF 6 <br />