My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 5603
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 5600 - 5699 (April 25, 2007 - December 3, 2007)
>
Resolution 5603
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:25 PM
Creation date
3/3/2016 12:17:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� O� <br /> O � <br /> CITY of ORONO <br /> ,� ;. �., <br /> ti <br /> ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF T�E6C�T�COUNCIL <br /> �L`�kESI'IUg'�G NO. <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR— 1 C, One Family Lakeshore Residential <br /> District, which requires a minimum lot area of 0.50 acres and a minimum <br /> lot width of 100'. The applicant's lot is 0.37 acres in area and 52' in width <br /> at the shoreline and 57' in width at the 75' setback. <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing <br /> held on March 19, 200'7 where a recommendation was made to approve <br /> the variances for the new home based on the following findings: <br /> a. The applicant has agreed to remove any excess hardcover, including a <br /> concrete staircase along the south side of the home, within the 0-75' <br /> lake setback zone. <br /> b. The size footprint proposed is smaller than that of the other homes in <br /> the immediate neighborhood. <br /> c. The levels of hardcover and structural coverage on the property were <br /> previously approved by the City Council by Resolution Nos. 3213 & <br /> 3329. The applicant's current proposal does not exceed the limits <br /> approved for the property. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br /> and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, <br /> comments by the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br /> variance on the health, safety and welfare of the cotmiiunity. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are <br /> peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning <br /> district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic <br /> conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring <br /> property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is <br /> necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to <br /> preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in <br /> keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive <br /> Plan of the City. <br /> Pa,�e 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.