My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4215
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 4200 - 4299 (November 23, 1998 - May 24, 1999)
>
Resolution 4215
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:25 PM
Creation date
2/25/2016 2:36:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• f . <br /> /�� <br /> � O� <br /> O O <br /> ��b - CITY of ORONO <br /> � � <br /> �� G'� RESOWTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��kESH�4� NO. 4 � � � <br /> . The location of the boathouse makes it non-conforming due to the setbacks and <br /> hardcover within 75' of Lake Minnetonka. The structure is not a non- <br /> conforming use. <br /> 6. A hardship has been placed on the property due to the existing location of the <br /> structure 15' from Lake Minnetonka and 10' from the east property line. The <br /> boathouse was built prior to the adoption of the zoning ordinance and before a <br /> building permit would have been required, resulting in the boathouse being a <br /> legally non-conforming structure that could remain on the property during its <br /> useful life. The storm damage occurred prior to the structure's useful life being <br /> exhausted. <br /> 7. The deck located above the boathouse served as part of the structure's roof. <br /> Heavy winds damaged the deck and roof, requiring both to be fully replaced. <br /> Full replacement would require structural repairs to the boathouse to conform <br /> with the State Building Code, to include a new foundation and replacement of <br /> portions of the existing walls. The repairs are necessary to protect against an <br /> unsafe situation by placing a new roof and deck above a foundation not <br /> conforming to the State Building Code. <br /> 8. The City Council finds that the conditions e�sting on this property are peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br /> granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br /> property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br /> intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> 9. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br /> by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety <br /> and welfare of the community. <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.