My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 5668-not signed
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 5600 - 5699 (April 25, 2007 - December 3, 2007)
>
Resolution 5668-not signed
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2015 7:43:47 AM
Creation date
2/25/2016 1:38:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY of ORONO <br />AN <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />The Planning Commission reviewed this application at public hearing held on <br />August 17, 2007 and recommended approval of renewing variances based on the <br />following findings: <br />a. The property contains 19,572 s.f in area and has 50' in width. <br />b. The lot is substandard in area and width and a residence has existed on the <br />property for many years. <br />c. There is no additional land available to bring the lot width or lot area into <br />conformity. <br />d. The hardcover variances as requested are in line with the levels of hardcover <br />variances approved on rebuild applications with similar lot conditions. The <br />proposed residence meets the structural lot coverage limitation of 15%. <br />e. The proposed structure complies with all lake yard, side yard, rear (street) <br />yard, and average lakeshore setback requirements. <br />f. The steepness and narrowness of the driveway warrants an additional 100 s.f. <br />of paved area near the street to allow for safer ingress and egress. <br />4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by <br />the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, <br />safety and welfare of the community. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to <br />it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting <br />the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire <br />hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br />convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship <br />or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; <br />and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and <br />Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.