My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-2016 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
02-22-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2016 11:09:01 AM
Creation date
2/25/2016 11:05:23 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
204
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 8, 2016 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 23 of 32 <br /> <br />11. #16-3803 STONEWOOD, LLC, ON BEHALF OF TASHITAA TUFAA, 1830 <br />SHORELINE ROAD, VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (continued) <br /> <br />McMillan asked if the Council is in agreement that there only be one curb cut. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the City Council that there be only one curb cut. <br /> <br />McMillan stated the Council should perhaps discuss where the curb cut should be located. McMillan <br />asked if the Council feels the driveway should be smaller. <br /> <br />Mattick noted that the applicants meet the hardcover requirements and that perhaps the Council could <br />look at that after they revise their plans. <br /> <br />Walsh commented the driveway would likely be smaller simply as a result of one of the curb cuts being <br />eliminated. <br /> <br />McMillan asked how the Council feels about the fence. <br /> <br />Printup, Walsh and McMillan agreed there does not appear to be a practical difficulty for the higher <br />fence. <br /> <br />Levang asked if there is one section that they would be allowed to have a 6-foot fence. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated that is correct. Curtis stated a 6-foot fence would be allowed from the setback at the 50- <br />foot setback up to the average setback line. <br /> <br />McMillan stated it appears the majority of the City Council is in agreement that the fence should be <br />limited to 42 inches in height. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if the City Council is okay with the conditional use permit. <br /> <br />Levang and Walsh indicated they are fine with the conditional use permit. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if there will be any landscaping. <br /> <br />Curtis stated if the Council would like to see the landscaping, they should specify that in the direction to <br />the applicant. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the City Council that the applicants submit plans reflecting the landscaping they <br />are proposing. <br /> <br />McMillan stated the Council should next discuss the side setback variance. <br /> <br />Walsh stated in his view the house should be redesigned and the side setback variance reduced. Walsh <br />stated he does not believe a 20-foot variance is needed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.