My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-2016 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
02-22-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2016 11:09:01 AM
Creation date
2/25/2016 11:05:23 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
204
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 8, 2016 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 18 of 32 <br /> <br />11. #16-3803 STONEWOOD, LLC, ON BEHALF OF TASHITAA TUFAA, 1830 <br />SHORELINE ROAD, VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (continued) <br /> <br />Walsh stated his concerns center around the practical difficulty issues given the fact that this is an empty <br />lot. Walsh stated there is no practical difficulty for the conditional use permit. <br /> <br />McMillan noted a conditional use permit does not require a practical difficulty. <br /> <br />Walsh stated he would not angle the house within the building envelope since that throws off the setbacks <br />and instead straighten it out to see if any variances are required. Walsh stated he also is not a big fan of <br />the two driveway cuts and that one curb cut would be fine, especially given the amount of driveway that <br />is then required. <br /> <br />Walsh stated the fence is more of a long-term issue and that he is not sure a 6-foot fence around the entire <br />property is necessary, especially from an aesthetics standpoint. Walsh stated he has a lot of questions <br />about how the project is being laid out on the lot and that they could probably bring the house further <br />back. <br /> <br />Gustafson indicated he has constructed a number of homes on the lake and that every one of them was <br />pushed as close as possible to the lake. Gustafson stated they are still pretty far from the lake. <br /> <br />Walsh noted one of the neighbors had voiced some concerns at the Planning Commission meeting about <br />the location of the house and that he was bringing it up so they could consider it. <br /> <br />Levang asked how guests would enter the property. Levang asked if the visitors would enter off of <br />Heritage Lane and then exit onto Heritage Drive. <br /> <br />Gustafson stated that was the thought and that a number of the other properties in the area have a circular <br />drive. Gustafson stated if there was not a second curb cut, they would have to create additional parking <br />area. <br /> <br />Levang stated if the Heritage Lane curb cut was eliminated, guests would need to back up and a bump-out <br />would probably be required but would eliminate one curb cut and possibly reduce the hardcover. <br /> <br />Gustafson noted they are well under the hardcover limit and that the driveway would likely have to be <br />made wider for parking. <br /> <br />Levang noted they have pulled the fence back from what was presented at the Planning Commission and <br />varied it somewhat, but that there might be a way to shorten it up back near the driveway off of Heritage. <br />Levang commented she wants to be compassionate about the special needs child but that there might be a <br />way to shorten it up. <br /> <br />Gustafson asked if it is the height of the fence rather than the location or amount of fence that is the main <br />concern. <br /> <br />Levang indicated it is. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.