Laserfiche WebLink
� � o� <br /> � o <br /> - ������:- CITY of URONO <br /> � �:� ,,. ; � <br /> �� ��, :a�"�`- �ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��kESII�4��' N0. ��' ;�=- ;`�. -� <br /> NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of <br /> Oroizo, Miiulesota: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1. This renewal application was reviewed as Zoning File #04-3047. The <br /> original application was reviewed as Zoning File #03-2936. <br /> 2. The property is loeated in the LR — 1C zoning district, which requires a <br /> minimum lot area of `/z acre and a minimum lot width of 100 feet. The <br /> applicants' property is .49 acres and has a �vidth of 60 feet. <br /> 3. The Plaiuling Commissioi� revie�ved this application at a public hearing <br /> held on September 20, 2004 and granted approval of the renewal <br /> hardcover and lake setback variance for the 0-75' zone based on the <br /> following City Council findings of original 2003 application: <br /> a. The nature of the property in the 0-75' zone is steep slopes being <br /> supported by retaining walls. <br /> b. Currently, the existing lakeshore deck is bolted to a concrete retaining <br /> wall which is supporting 8' of eai•th. <br /> c, After engineering reviews, the interdependency of the wall on the decic <br /> is inconclusive; however, Council action to require removal of the <br /> deck may have unintended negative. consequences. Should the deck be <br /> required to be removed and detached from the retaining wall, there is <br /> the potential that the ret�ining wall may fail, subsequently causing <br /> slope failure. <br /> d. The existing conditions of the retaining wall and attached deck support <br /> the slope. <br /> e. Absent the unique conditions noted above, the lakeshore deck would <br /> normally not be allowed to remain, as it is a nonconforming structure <br /> . and the property is undergoing a complete teardown/rebuild of the <br /> principal structure. <br /> Page2of6 <br />„... _ <br />_ I <br />