Laserfiche WebLink
� o � <br /> 0 0 <br /> ' �a�;,, „� � CITY of ORONO <br /> � � ,�. <br /> � Y' :a` ~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��`9kEsi30g'�G NO. 5 T 6 5 <br /> A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES <br /> TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> SECTIONS 78-1288 AND 78-1404 <br /> F'ILE NO. 08-3350 <br /> WHEREfRS., Fa�ederi��: C,'. I'�ters, � single perso�n, (herEinaft�r "Ow,�.er") is <br /> the owj�er. oi the property lcJcated at 3127 Ca��o Circle within the City of Orono (hereinafter <br /> "City") and legally described as: Lot 2, Blcck 1, Colarado Springs, Hennepin County, <br /> Miimesota (hereinafter "the Property"); and <br /> WHEREAS, J.Sven Gustafson has made application on behalf of the Owner <br /> to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1404 to allow a tennis court <br /> larger than 1,000 squre feet in the street yard of a replacement residence and a side setback <br /> variance to place the tennis court 22 feet from the northerly side property line when a 30 foot <br /> setback is required; and <br /> WHEREAS, J.Sven Gustafson has made application on behalf of the Owner <br /> to the City for a Variance to 1Vlunicipal Zoning Code Section 78-1288 to allow 37% hardcover <br /> in the 250 to 500 foot zone when the maximum is 30%; and <br /> WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with <br /> Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning <br /> Commission held a public hearing on March 17, 2008, at which times all persons desiring to <br /> be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Cit�f Council of Orono, <br /> :��1inr���sot�i: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #08-3350. <br /> 2. The Property is located in the LR-1C zoning district, where 0.� acre is the <br /> minimum lot area and 100 feet is the minimum lot width. The Property is <br /> approximately 1.14 acres in area and 100 feet in width. <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on March 17, 2008 and on <br /> a vote of 5 - 2 recommended approval of the variances, based on the followin� <br /> Page 1 of 4 <br />