Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 11, 2016 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 13 of 24 <br /> <br />12. CONSIDER SALE OF CITY PROPERTY, PID NO. 05-117-23-24-0118 (continued) <br />At the present time Staff is in the process of fine tuning the language on the agreement and easements. <br />Barnhart recommended the City Council approve it conceptually with the stipulation that the City <br />Attorney can make some minor modifications. <br /> <br />City Attorney Mattick stated they are 99 percent of the way there with the language, and if the Council is <br />satisfied with the substance of the agreement, they can approve it tonight. Mattick stated if something of <br />substance needs to be changed, that would come back before the City Council. <br /> <br />Walsh moved, Cornick seconded, to approve the Land Exchange Agreement between the City of <br />Orono and Jacob J. Barkley and Maureen L. Barkley for the sale of property, PID No. 05-117-23- <br />24-0118, subject to the agreement being brought back before the City Council if any substantive <br />changes are made. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />*13. VACATE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AT 2500 SHADYWOOD ROAD – <br />RESOLUTION NO. 6579 <br /> <br />Printup moved, Levang seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6579, a Resolution Rescinding <br />Resolution No. 3561 for the property located at 2500 Shadywood Road. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0, <br />McMillan abstained. <br /> <br />14. MARIANI REQUEST TO EXPAND MUSA BOUNDARY <br /> <br />Barnhart stated the property owner at 3020 Sixth Avenue is requesting the Council support his requests to <br />expand the MUSA boundary to incorporate his property. This change would require a Comprehensive <br />Plan Amendment. <br /> <br />The property was the subject of a lot line rearrangement in June of 2015. As part of that process, the <br />developer submitted a survey and report with two septic sites for each lot. The City received and <br />reviewed the report but did not conduct a site inspection since a site inspection is not commonly <br />completed at this stage. <br /> <br />The property owner then applied for a permit to remodel the existing home. As part of that permit <br />application, a site inspection was conducted and it was noted that the sites identified by the septic <br />designer did not meet separation requirements and soil conditions that would allow a Type I system <br />which is required by City ordinance. A Type III system could be installed consistent with city and state <br />requirements. The property owner would prefer a Type I system due to maintenance needs. <br /> <br />The question before the Council is whether the City is interested in expanding the MUSA. There is a <br />sanitary sewer that serves the properties on the south side of Sixth Avenue, approximately 325 feet to the <br />south. The connection would require an expansion of the MUSA area and a modification of the <br />Comprehensive Plan. The property owner is also requesting waiver of the connection fee. <br /> <br />Mariani stated in speaking with Mike Gaffron, he indicated he did check to see if there is an opening in <br />the MUSA and that there is an opening. <br /> <br /> <br />