My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-11-2016 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
01-11-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2020 10:09:58 AM
Creation date
2/11/2016 10:08:14 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
361
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 14, 2015 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT (continued) <br />McMillan stated she had talked with the family and they were a go with the off -leash dog area but that <br />they would like the City pay for the infrastructure for that area. McMillan stated she suggested this item <br />be brought before the City Council in February since it would involve some more complex issues and that <br />she would like the Council to work in tandem with the Park Commission on this item. <br />McMillan stated she would also like to thank Staff for their hard work this year and that in her view it has <br />been a productive year. <br />CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />18. WAYZATA FIRE SERVICE AGREEMENT <br />City Administrator Loftus stated before the City Council tonight is the Wayzata Fire Service Agreement. <br />Loftus noted the City has contracted with the City of Wayzata for fire service to a portion of Orono since <br />at least 1962. Loftus noted the cost is going down slightly from 2015. <br />Printup stated he is opposed to this old, expensive contract. Printup stated the agreement is over 50 years <br />old and that the data and facts will speak for themselves. Printup stated in his view the City could get <br />very similar service for much less and that this is not the first time he has talked about this. Printup noted <br />he had suggested holding neighborhood meetings, which did not happen, but that it is time to act on this <br />and move the other way. Printup stated in his view this has been an issue in the past of emotion versus <br />logic and that there is no threat to public safety if the agreement is not renewed. <br />Printup noted there are nearly 4,000 parcels in Orono. This contract will cost $29,000 for 2016 and <br />covers approximately 180 parcels, which is approximately 4.5 percent of Orono. With an average of 22 <br />calls for service per year, that is over $1,000 a call. According to the NFPA, the National Fire Protection <br />Association, the average response time for a rural area of less than 500 people per square mile is 14 <br />minutes. Orono's response time is far below that, with an average of 6.29 minutes. Orono's response <br />time is way below average. <br />Printup noted there is also a department in Navarre that sits one mile from Minnetonka Beach but yet the <br />department in another city three miles away covers Minnetonka Beach. Printup stated the Orono Police <br />Department is usually on the scene first. From a public safety factor, the police are normally on the <br />scene first and the local departments also have mutual aid to help people. Printup stated the bottom line is <br />that people get help and they get help fast and are usually attended to by the police before anyone else. <br />Printup stated the bottom line deals with the following three issues: (1) There is no threat to public health <br />and safety by voting the contract down. Fire departments fight fires. While police cannot fight a fire, <br />they can render aid and be on the scene. (2) The police are normally on the scene first and can provide <br />aid. (3) The police are normally on the scene for alarms and many times they are false alarms. Nearly all <br />calls for service are medically related alarms and not for fire calls. Printup stated based on quantity and <br />the pricing formula, the contract cost to add 180 parcel service area to Long Lake would be around $4,500 <br />as a result of the call area being so small versus $29,000 with Wayzata. Printup stated this would allow <br />savings to the taxpayers without diminished service. <br />Page 38 of 44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.