Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 11, 2016 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />*6. 2016 ENGINEERING SERVICES RATE SCHEDULE <br />Levang moved, Printup seconded, to approve the 2016 Consulting Engineer Services Fee Schedule. <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />*7. KELLY AVENUE DRAINAGE (CARMEN OUTLET) <br />Levang moved, Printup seconded, to approve Pay Request No.1 to Kusske Construction in the <br />amount of $60,953.28 for the reconstruction of the Kelly Avenue storm sewer outfall project at <br />Carmen Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />*8. CARMEN BAY SHORELINE RESTORATION PROJECT — PAY REQUEST NO.6 <br />Levang moved, Printup seconded, to approve Pay Request No. 6 for the contractor Sunram <br />Construction, Inc., in the amount of $2,830.73 for the Carmen Bay Shoreline Restoration Project. <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT <br />*9. ADOPT BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION (BCA) JOINT POWERS <br />AGREEMENT (RENEWAL) — RESOLUTION NO. 6577 <br />Levang moved, Printup seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6577, a Resolution Approving State <br />of Minnesota Joint Powers Agreements with the City of Orono on Behalf of its City Attorney and <br />Police Department. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT <br />*10. #15-3796 A. SADOWSKI DESIGNS O/B/O MICHELLE WILLIAMS-ABBOTT — 2941 <br />CASCO POINT ROAD AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK VARIANCE — RESOLUTION NO. <br />6576 <br />Levang moved, Printup seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6576, a Resolution Approving a <br />Variance from Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1270 for the property located at 2941 Casco <br />Point Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />11. #16-3804 LAKEWEST, LLC/CURT FRETHEIM, 3245 WAYZATA BOULEVARD — <br />SKETCH PLAN REVIEW <br />Curt Fretham, Applicant, was present along with Ben Wikstrom and Rick Harrison. <br />Senior Planner Gaffron stated the applicants have submitted a sketch plan for a proposed 27-unnit single- <br />family detached townhome development on the portions of the property not encumbered by the former <br />sanitary landfill. Discussion of the potential for a second phase of development for a multi -family <br />building on a portion of the landfill site is also requested. <br />Page 7 of 24 <br />