Laserfiche WebLink
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
, , �. , <br /> INTRODUCTION <br /> The subject parcel is approximately 9 acres and dominated by grassy lawn, wetland, and forested <br /> upland. Two single-family homes lie within the west-central portion of the parceL The site has <br /> moderately undulating topography throughout with the lowest points being at the east end of the <br /> parcel toward Wetland 1. Brown Road borders the parcel on its west side (Figure 1). The area <br /> surrounding the�parcel is primarily residential. <br /> All identified wetlands were classified according to the Cowardin et al. (1979),and the US Fish and <br /> Wildlife Service Circular 39 classification systems and staked with lath or pin flags. Field data <br /> sheets,plant indicator status information,soil survey information,and wetland definition information <br /> can be found within the Technical Documentation Section. <br /> METHODS <br /> The methods used to delineate the subject parcel are described in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers <br /> 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual, under the "routine" methods for sites less than 5 acres. This <br /> methodology is followed in order to assess whether the three criteria of a wetland are met for areas <br /> on the subject parcel. The three parameters required under normal circumstances in order to <br /> delineate a wetland are described below. <br /> National Wetland Inventory(NWI)maps(Figure 2),Soil Survey of Hennepin County maps(Figure <br /> 3),Minnesota Protected Waters maps (Figure 4),and 2003 aerial photographs were reviewed prior to <br /> the site visit to identify areas that may be wetlands. Areas illustrating evidence of wetland conditions <br /> were examined in greater detail during the field survey. Vegetation, soils and hydrology were <br /> examined (as outlined in the 1987 Manual) and used to characterize wetland types and determine <br /> wetland boundaries.Sample transects were established in representative wetland-to-upland transition <br /> zones in order to characterize the vegetation, soils, and hydrology of the site. Transects consisted of <br /> representative upland sample point(s) and representative wetland sample point(s). Information <br /> obtained from the sample points can be found on the field data sheets located in The Technical <br /> Documentation Section. <br /> Wetland boundaries were marked at the site by blaze-orange"wetland boundary"flagging attached <br /> to 4-foot wooden lath or pin flags. Where vegetation was dense,to assist in locating the flagged lath <br /> (wetland edge), a second piece of flagging was attached to a nearby tree or shrub branch. The <br /> "wetland boundary"is considered to be the topographically highest extent of the wetland basin; areas <br /> below the staked boundary met the three required wetland criteria while areas above were lacking in <br /> one or more of these criteria. <br /> Wetland classification followed methods described by Cowardin et aL (1979) and used in the NWI <br /> (e.g. PEMB, PSS1C, etc.), completed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The Circular 39 <br /> classification (Shaw and Fredine 1956) is also given (e.g. Type l, Type 2...etc.). The indicator <br /> Svoboda Ecological Resources 940 Brown Road <br /> Project No.: 2006-109-03 2 Catherine Johnston <br />