My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
correspondence re need for survey
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Brown Road North
>
1020 Brown Road North - 27-118-23-42-0019
>
Correspondence
>
correspondence re need for survey
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:22:20 PM
Creation date
1/28/2016 2:00:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1020
Street Name
Brown
Street Type
Road
Street Direction
North
Address
1020 Brown Road North
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
2711823420019
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a .. <br /> , <br /> , . �; <br /> Request to City Council: <br /> We are asking to be issued a building pernnit to proceed with the repair of our <br /> deck without obtaining a site survey of I020 N. Brown Road. <br /> Reasons request should be granted: <br /> l. We are REPAIRINCJ an existing deck - not adding a iiew siructure. We <br /> originally planned ta replace a few rotted boards but had to replaee the <br /> existing joists due to more extensive rot. The �emoval of the joists tnggered <br /> the need for the building permit and we were told by the city engineer that he <br /> does not have the authority to issue any building permit without a site survey. <br /> 2. The deck doe� not extend beyond the footprint of the house. The deck is <br /> being built in an L-shaped corner of the house between the screen porch and <br /> the garage. The hause, screen porch and deck were all present when we <br /> bought the property. The title company required the property be surveyed at <br /> that time to ensure that all structures were within the property lines including <br /> easements. It was determined at that time that the structures are well within <br /> the boundaries. <br /> 3. The replacement deok is the same design as the previous deck. It is in <br /> fact slightly sma.11er than the original which further ensures that there is no <br /> possible way that the deck will extend beyond the footprint of the house. <br /> 4. The site survey is an unnecessary expense for this project and will add <br /> hundreds of dollars of additional expense without adding any value to the <br /> homeowner or �he community. This project started as a simple repair job <br /> and is already several thousand dollazs more expensiv� than we had planned <br /> to spend. We will be bound by the building inspections which will ensure <br /> that we do not deviate from the original plan. <br /> 5. The requirement of a site survey will also delay our repair for weeks, <br /> � which will reduce the time we have to enjoy our repaired deck over the <br /> summer and may cause us to leave the repair until next year. It would be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.