Laserfiche WebLink
, <br /> � The definition of appropriate hydrology according to the l 987 Manual includes two important terms <br /> that must be clarified. First, the definition of a growing season is needed. The growing season is <br /> � defined in the 1987 Manual as: "...the portion of the year when soil temperature (measured 19.7 <br /> inches below the surface) is above biological zero (5° C or 41° F)." According to the 1987 Manual <br /> , this period of time can be approximated by using the "starting and ending dates for the growing <br /> season based on a 28° F air temperature threshold at a frequency of 5 years in 10." Based on this <br /> defimtion the growing season ranges approximately 160 days to 180 days in the Minneapolis/SC. Paul <br /> � metropolitan area (160 in the northern suburbs and greater to the south). Therefore, the required <br /> inundation or saturation to the surface for 5% of the growing season would be 8 or 9 consecutive <br /> days that ground water would need to be at the surface or saturated to the surtace. <br /> � The second term in the appropriate hydrology definition from the above paragraph to be clarified is <br /> "in most years". This means in 5 of 10 years hydrology must exist within a"jurisdictional wetland" <br /> ' for the 8 or 9 consecutive days of the growing season. This means that one observation date or even <br /> one whole year worth of detailed hydrology data may be deemed insufficient to determine if <br /> appropriate hydrology exists at a given location. In the event that precipitation events accumulate to <br /> � above or below normal during just prior to a site visit or during a more intensive hydrology study,the <br /> data may be confounded by non-normal circumstances and may be considered outside the bounds of <br /> "most years". Ideally, both antecedent soil moist�ire conditions and precipitation would be normal <br /> � during all delineations. However, this is not a realisCic impression of climate. Therefore, primary <br /> indicators of hydrology must be reviewed with scrutiny prior to determining if hydrology indeed <br /> exists. <br /> � Wetland hydrology may be observed as standing water (inundation), or may be observed as <br /> freestanding water within a soil pit ar auger hole (saturation) usually within the upper 12 inches. <br /> , This is what would be considered primary hydrology indicators. Examination of this indicator <br /> requires digging a soil pit to a depth of 16 inches and observing the level at which water stands after <br /> � sufficient time has been allowed for water to drain into the hole. The required time will vary <br /> depending on soil texture. This level represents the depth to the water table; the depth to saturated <br /> soils will always be nearer the surface due to the capillary fringe. According to the Hydrology <br /> � criteria in the 1987 Delineation Manual,for soil saturation to impact vegetation,it must occur within <br /> a major portion of the root zone, typically within ]2 inches of the surface. Only one primary <br /> indicator is necessary to make the determination that wetland hydrology is present. However,since a <br /> � single observation is not enough evidence, based on the percentage of the growing season this <br /> inundation or saturation is required,these data are only valid when reviewed while also considering <br /> the abundance of recent precipitation events or the seasonal trend of climate when the site visit was <br /> � made(this may be done through review of precipitation records where available). In addition to the <br /> primary indicators of wetland hydrology,there are secondary indicators(e.g.oxidized root channels, <br /> water-stained leaves, local soil survey data, FAC-Neutral test), of which two must be present to <br /> � consider the sample point as having wetland hydrology. <br /> � <br /> � Svoboda Ecological Resources 744 Brown Road North <br /> Project No.:2007-081-03 28 Ted Schultze <br /> 1 <br />