My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-P07441 (add/remodel/repair)
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road - (AKA: Co. Rd. 84)
>
4010 Bayside Road - 06-117-23-11-0007 - New PID
>
4010 Bayside Rd - 06-117-23-11-0006 - Old PID
>
Permits/Inspections
>
2004-P07441 (add/remodel/repair)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:23:03 PM
Creation date
1/19/2016 1:27:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
4010
Street Name
Bayside
Street Type
Road
Address
4010 Bayside Rd
Document Type
Permits/Inspections
PIN
0611723110007
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A �� <br /> � , �s '� � � <br /> � ����� � <br /> En ineerrn Partners Internati ��� <br /> g g onal LLC <br /> Engineers Consuitants t�lanager� <br /> June 2, 2004 <br /> Mr. Curtis Levang <br /> 4010 Bayside Road <br /> Maple Plain, MN 55359 <br /> Re: Roof Addition <br /> Levang Residence <br /> Dear Mr. Levang: <br /> It is my understanding that your plan to remodel your house by constructing a gable and <br /> dormer roof system thus replacing the existing flat roof and clerestories, has been <br /> suspended by the local building official until a resolution on the adequacy of the existing <br /> foundation wall has been rea.ched. <br /> On May 26, 2004, I inspected the house and the existing 8 in. thick concrete masonry unit <br /> (cmu) foundation wall. I have also had the opportunity to review the proposed plans, <br /> prepared by Scott Schneider dated May 4, 2004, for the proposed roof remodeling. <br /> Based upon that inspection and subsequent review of the drawings, it is my professional <br /> opinion that the existing 8 in. cmu wall is more than adequate to carry the proposed loads. <br /> The 8 in. cmu wall has an approximate allowable Fa compressive stress of 168 psi based <br /> upon an assumed value of�m =1500 psi prism strength. Assuming the new roof live and <br /> dead loads, attic live and dead loads from the old flat roof areas and the existing floor <br /> loads, the wall will experience approximately 50 psi compressive stress loads. This will <br /> yield a safety factor of more than 3.0. This analysis was done on the north foundation <br /> wall east of the fireplace, which by inspection would receive the greatest contributing <br /> additional loads. <br /> Therefore in my opinion, the new code requirements of a 12 in. cmu wall can be waived <br /> in lieu of the existing 8 in. cmu wall based upon my specific analysis of the actual <br /> proposed loading cond' - <br /> Very ly �i' ��� <br /> . <br /> / . !�i / <br /> - �� //�' _ ------_._.___ <br /> eei'ing P�rt rs International, LLC � <br /> Richard M. Greenlee, P.E. <br /> MN Registration No. 9952 <br /> 9724 Rich Curve phone 952.831.2471 <br /> Bloomington,Minnesota 55437 fax 952.897.1 152 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.