Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 14, 2015 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />13. #15-3774 MICHAEL STEADMAN 0/11/0 IRWIN ACOBS, 1700 SHORELINE DRIVE — <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL — RESOLUTION NO. 6569 <br />Gaffron stated at the November 23 City Council meeting, the Council voted 5-0 to table the application, <br />directing Staff to prepare a revised Preliminary Plat Approval Resolution for review and consideration. <br />The revisions include the following: <br />1. Page 2 — Documentation of 11123 meeting actions. <br />2. Page 3 — Removal of the reference to Outlots A, B, and C and replace with just Outlot A. <br />3. Page 4, Item 11, revised language to exclude reference to three outlots, added tie-in of Outlot A to <br />Lot 4. <br />4. Page 7, Item 1, revised language regarding outlots. <br />5. Page 9, Item 8(c), revised construction hours per Council discussion, added definition of road <br />Completion. <br />6. Page 9, Item 8(h). The Council had suggested adding the applicants proposed school <br />pickup/drop-off traffic control as Item 8(h), but there was not a consensus of whether that <br />authority should be placed only on the Police Chief. After discussions with the Police Chief and <br />City Attorney, Staff has substituted text with regard to the process for determining if and when a <br />problem exists and a process for addressing it. The School District's bus schedule for Heritage <br />Lane has only minimal a.m. /p.m. overlap with the 8:30-4:00 restriction, with the exception of <br />secondary student drop-off from 2:55 to 3:15 p.m. <br />7. Page 9, Item 8(i), language has been added addressing the process to be followed regarding <br />installation of temporary speed bumps, requiring majority petition of homeowners, public hearing <br />and Council approval. <br />The applicant has also provided a drawing showing the proposed temporary signage for traffic control. <br />Absent further information, Staff assumes these will be placed within the development site. Placement of <br />the signs within City or County right-of-way would require appropriate approvals. <br />Staff recommends adoption of the draft resolution. Council should direct Staff with regard to any <br />necessary revisions in order to accurately reflect Council's conclusions with regard to this subdivision. <br />Michael Steadman stated they are in agreement with Staff and would be able to answer any questions. <br />Levang stated on Page 3 of the resolution, Point 9, she would like to clarify that what is being discussed <br />in Point No. 9 is the extension of the road and that they are not talking about the homes themselves. <br />Levang stated she would like that language to read as follows: "Residents of the Foxhill neighborhood <br />have expressed concerns with safety, noise, and general neighborhood disruption anticipated with regard <br />to the construction of the public road improvements. <br />Page 20 of 44 <br />