My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-16-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
11-16-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2016 10:05:02 AM
Creation date
1/13/2016 10:04:27 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MIN�UTES OF TSE , <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMNIISSION MEETiNG <br /> Monday,October 19,2015 /'� <br /> 6:30 o'ciock p.m. �v <br /> Gaffron indicabed that is correct. � �' �� <br /> �i�'. � <br /> � <br /> Lemke pointed out the house on the left appears to be closer to the lake. <br /> Schoenzeit asked if these homes are afforded aa average lakeshore setback. <br /> Gaffron sta�ed the agplicaats' house and the house on ai�er side would be considered lakeshore lots. The <br /> homes furtber east are not lekeshore lats. Gaffron statied the lat to the immedisxe east wouid have aa <br /> average lakeshor�setback argument where tha one fi�er east would not <br /> Schcenzeit aslced if ti�a distance from the bay window to the 6-foot line is 13 feet based on the survey. <br /> Gaffron stated the 6-foot lina is an old lot line and ti�at one lot is 44 feet wide and one lot is 56 feet wid,o. <br /> Schoenz�it stated given ti�e issues with the averag�e lakeshor�setback for the aeighbor,in his view a <br /> single double�ieep garage attached to the house is far more appropriate than locating tk�e detac�aed garage <br /> there. Schcenzeit stated ft is his understanding t�e applicant was not the owner when the ald gazsge was <br /> ti�ere snd that it was just a slab whan he putchased it. <br /> Gaf&on indicated thsi is correct and that the applicant puzchasad die properiy tast spring. <br /> Lenake asked whan the garage was removed. <br /> Gaffron indicated that w8s done in 2011. <br /> Schoenzeit stated in his view there is the opportunity to construct a siu�gle double-deep garage that is <br /> pretty such the same start and finish of the neighbor's house which would not block the view out the <br /> back. Scb.oenz�eit st�bed if ti�at neighbar has a lakeshare setback,the Pianning Commission is obligated to <br /> protect that view. <br /> The Planning Commissian viewed some photographs of the property. <br /> Gaffron asked if Commissioner Schoenzeit is suggesting that the applicants remove the bump-oirt. <br /> Page 14 of 44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.