My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-16-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
11-16-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2016 10:05:02 AM
Creation date
1/13/2016 10:04:27 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> ,, r�IINiJTES OF THE PC Exhibit G <br /> ' ORONO PLANNING CONIIVIi3SION MEETIl�TG <br /> Mondsy,October 19,�015 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> � <br /> NEW BU3INES5 ~`' J1 <br /> v�� <br /> �� <br /> 3. #15-3769 CHRIS LAPPEN AND KALLYN BIALOWA5,3409 EAST LAKE STREET, <br /> VARIANCES,7:02 P.M.—7:40 P.M, <br /> Chris Lappan,Applicant,was pr�en�t, <br /> Gat�xron stated the applicants sre requesting varisaces to const�uct a 21'x 21' detached garage. The <br /> applicents have 61 p�cent hardcover oa the properEy�un�ntly and would ba reducing it to 49 percen� <br /> Cuzrently t3�ey are allowed 25 percent. The lot consists of S,Sb2 square feet in a 2-acre zone. T�e <br /> P�P�B�Se is located five feet from t�e east side Iot line and will replace a g�rage that was removed <br /> approximabely ai8ht Years ago. The proposad garage is being moved further fro�m the ci+eek but will still <br /> be 18.5 feet from ti�.a creek where a 75-foot setback is noxmally roq+�ired. <br /> Ea�rly ir�the applicatian process there was concarn about having to pla�e fill in the floodplain area. Based <br /> on discussions with the I�iinnehaha Creek Watarshed District,t�e flood elevation is 935' and the <br /> applicanfs will not need to fiIl w►itb�in the flaodplain. <br /> The agplication also involves a setback fmm the existing house of 10 feet,which meets the atandard, 'The <br /> applicazxts could move the garage forward but that wovld raquu�e an additional vaziance to be less tiian 10 <br /> feet from a structure. Staff is not recvmmending that. The properiy is allowed 1500 sgusre feet st�vctural <br /> feet because the lot is less than 10,000 square feet The property is cunrentty at 1,615 square f�et,jvst <br /> slightly over�e limi� The applicams couid reduce both c�imensions of the garag�e by a few inches and <br /> mcet the 1500 square f�eet but$taff do�not f�ael that is a big issue. The applicants cuuld malce it a single- <br /> stell garage and attach it to tha house but that is aot what the applicants prefer. <br /> As it re�aLes to the avexage 2akeshore s�tb�ck variance,the PraPoeed�,�aSe i�completiely beyond the line. <br /> The praperly is severely limited by the si.ze sad shape of t�e lot,the location and arientation of the <br /> existing house,aad the limitations imposed by the creek that ia considered as lelceshore far zoning <br /> purposes. In St�s opinion the praposed garage locatian would appear to be t�easonable for a minimum- <br /> si�ed detached twastall g�rage. <br /> Page 9 of 44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.