My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-16-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
11-16-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2016 10:05:02 AM
Creation date
1/13/2016 10:04:27 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, October 19, 2015 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Lemke stated if that happens, he is going to be pretty mad. Lemke asked if the City can retroactively put <br /> an ordinance in. <br /> Barnhart stated in working with the City Attorney, this is the approach they arrived at, which was to come <br /> at it from a nuisance standpoint. Barnhart noted the living wall would need to be located within the <br /> average lakeshore as defined in the ordinance. Barnhart stated if the City receives a complaint and it is <br /> determined to be a living wall, mitigation could include removing one ar more trees. <br /> McGrann stated he agrees with Commissioner Lemke, and that out of 100 times that this has happened, <br /> perhaps only three or four are intentional. McGrann commented they could be opening up Pandora's <br /> Box. <br /> Schoenzeit stated there could also be a number of people who are impacted and are getting no relief. <br /> McGrann asked if he can call the City and say Bruce's trees are a nuisance even though he does not live <br /> next to him. <br /> Barnhart stated anyone could complain as the ordinance is currently written. <br /> Lemke stated in his view the City is asking for trouble if they have an ordinance that is difficult to <br /> enforce. Lemke stated if the ordinance makes a lot of people upset,he is not sure the City should pursue <br /> it. <br /> Landgraver asked if Commissioner Lemke is suggesting grandfathering the trees or whether he is against <br /> the ordinance. <br /> Lemke stated he is suggesting grandfathering the trees. Lemke noted that then raises the question of how <br /> the City would know the trees are grandfathered. Lemke stated he is not sure how the City would <br /> regulate that. <br /> McGrann stated he has no problem moving forward with being more restrictive on living walls but that in <br /> his view the retroactive piece is going to be difficult to determine. <br /> Page 38 of 44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.