My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-16-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
11-16-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2016 10:05:02 AM
Creation date
1/13/2016 10:04:27 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,October 19,2015 <br /> 6:30 dclock p.m. <br /> Russin displayed a picture of his inaster bedroom and the reflection of the light on the bedroom door. <br /> Russin pointed out his bedroom has small windows,which prevents even more light from coming in,but <br /> that it is still lit up. In addition,the entire back of their house is lit up by this individual's lights. <br /> Russin stated in one of the court hearings, the judge wrote in her order that this individual would probably <br /> put a cannon on the dock and fire it because the City did not specifically say he could not. Russin stated <br /> in his view, whenever they ask far a relief valve, the neighbor will do something else to circumvent the <br /> City's regulations, which is why he is asking for more detail to be included in the ordinance. <br /> Russin displayed a picture of the Wagner property. Russin indicated originally there were five of these <br /> lights and each one of them has three bulbs. Russin stated they also light up the inside of his house all <br /> night long. Another five lights have since been put in, for a total of 30 bulbs now. Russin stated he is in <br /> favor of beautifying property but that he is not sure why these lights have to stay on until 1:30 at night. <br /> Russin stated if they were for safety, they would stay on all night long. Russin stated he does not care <br /> that these are commercial lights oi1 the property but that they cannot stay on until 1 or 2 in the morning. <br /> Russin stated the only time they vary is because of daytime savings. Russin stated their entire house is lit <br /> up on both sides. Russin noted the lights are 53 feet from the lake and that in his view it is a safety hazard <br /> because someone might mistake them for landing lights since there are so many of them. <br /> Russin stated the neighbor initially started with a flashlight over his head as he walked through the <br /> easement path and that he called it in numerous times but the police questioned how he would know it <br /> was his neighbor. Russin indicated he finally put an aniinal camera on the easement, which stopped the <br /> neighbor from doing that. The neighbor then put a construction light near the garage and focused the <br /> light on his wife while she lay in bed. Russin stated he again called the police several times but nothing <br /> was done. As a result, they secured a mirror in the tree and shined the light back in his house, which <br /> stopped that. After that the neigbbor installed the lights down by the lake. <br /> Russin stated this situation has been going on for ten years and that the ordinance also needs to consider <br /> the time of day the lights are on. Russin stated unnatural light can be harmful. Russin stated they are not <br /> concerned with someone lighting their property with motion detectors for safety, but that he has 141ights <br /> shining on his property and into his house. <br /> Page 34 of 44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.