My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-16-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
11-16-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2016 10:05:02 AM
Creation date
1/13/2016 10:04:27 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,October 19,2015 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> with a sewer easement, which was incorrectly recarded by about ten feet and limited what the previous <br /> owners were able to do. <br /> Wipson stated if you look at where the property is located, it is fairly unique. Crystal Bay Road basically <br /> wraps around the corner, and when you look at Shadywood Road,the elevation is quite high above what <br /> he is proposing. Wipson stated it is a fairly small garage as opposed to his neighbors on Crystal Bay <br /> Road and that the impact to the neighborhood is very minimal. Wipson stated the view from Crystal Bay <br /> Road is very narrow view due to the vegetation and is very well screened. <br /> Wipson stated as it relates to the massing, the apparent size of the lot is much bigger than the legal lot is <br /> due to being on the corner. Wipson stated there is an additiona120 or so feet of apparent lot width that is <br /> city owned and is the street easement. <br /> Wipson stated many of the issues relate to them not having a safe haven, which was brought to the <br /> forefront in July of this year when the tornado sirens sounded. Wipson indicated they actually had to <br /> leave their home and go to a friend's house. Wipson stated they were aware of that when they purchased <br /> the property but that the storm brought home the fact that they need something to protect their family. <br /> Wipson stated they also were aware that the priar owners had applied for a variance at about the time they <br /> were purchasing the property but that they would prefer to have one large addition rather than two smaller <br /> additions since it would be more functional. <br /> Landgraver asked what the practical difficulty is far the extra two feet of cantilever. <br /> Wipson stated it would be for storage since there is not a lot of extra space in the house and existing <br /> garage. Wipson noted the driveway is also quite short. Wipson stated they experience a lot of challenges <br /> given the lack of storage space. <br /> Lemke asked why Staff recommends dimensional limitations be placed on the overhang. <br /> Page 19 of 44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.