My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-19-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
10-19-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2016 9:15:37 AM
Creation date
1/13/2016 9:15:10 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, September 21, 2015 <br /> 6:30 dclock p.m. <br /> Steadman noted they were required to do a Conservation Design Report,which has been completed and is <br /> very extensive. The purpose of the report is to protect the wetlands, the woodlands, and vegetation. <br /> Steadman stated if a temporary access road is required, in his opinion that report would be non-effective. <br /> Steadman indicated he has been selling real estate in Orono for 30 years, and one of the great pleasures is <br /> being able to communicate the difference between Orono and other cities in the Metro. Steadman stated <br /> the City's legacy are the acreage sites ranging from one acre on up. <br /> Steadman stated the first photograph on the overhead depicts Shoreline Drive. Irwin Jacobs owns <br /> approximately 750 feet along Shoreline Drive. The only access is the driveway to the east. Steadman <br /> pointed out the sharp curve coming from the west. Due to the wetlands,this is the only driveway access <br /> to the site. <br /> Steadman stated they have done a pretty complete analysis of the property and that they have looked at <br /> two alternative access sites. One possible access considered was over by the guest house and the other <br /> was the existing driveway. As it relates to the first option, as you go to the west,there is a 20 percent <br /> slope, which would make it extremely difficult to maneuver. <br /> Steadman stated the best temporary access that could possibly be used would be the main driveway. The <br /> temporary access would come behind the house but there is a 40-foot drop from the edge of the driveway <br /> to the proposed cul-de-sac, which is a dramatic drop. There is also a natural buffer between the 20-acre <br /> site that is being proposed for the main residence and the three lots, which is crucial for keeping the <br /> integrity of the property. Steadman pointed out where the temporary access would cut through the woods. <br /> Steadman indicated he does have a drawing that shows the grade limits, the impact, and how many trees <br /> would need to be removed as a result of the temporary access. Steadman noted the drawing shows the <br /> main residence,the driveway, and the nine acres that are full of maple trees, cherry trees, linden trees, <br /> hackberry trees, the wetlands, and the trail system. <br /> Steadman stated he would like to talk now about the impact a temporary access would have. The <br /> temporary access would result in an 1,800 foot temporary driveway compared to the 350-foot driveway <br /> that is being proposed onto Heritage Lane from Foxhill. Steadman noted there is a very dangerous left <br /> turn into the property. <br /> Steadman stated he also went out to the property with Doug Dobosinski of Dobosinski& Sons, who gave <br /> a recommendation that was submitted to the City. In his view grading trucks, dump trucks and cement <br /> trucks would have a difficult time maneuvering down the driveway,particularly in the steep slopes. <br /> Steadman stated when you look at the access point that would be carved in, which is essentially where the <br /> Jacobs' driveway ends and the cul-de-sac begins,there would need to be a 10 percent grade or a 12 <br /> percent grade. That would result in the removal of 127 trees and disturbing an area of approximately <br /> 25,000 square feet or half an acre. The amount of cut would be 150 cubic yards and the amount of fill <br /> required would be 1,500 cubic yards. In addition, erosion control would be a significant problem. <br /> Steadman stated the impact to Lots 2 and 3 would also be dramatic. Steadman noted the proposed homes <br /> are 600 feet from the Foxhill neighborhood, and as a result of the temporary access, those homes would <br /> be looking at an open area that has been dramatically changed from the natural topography. <br /> Page 3 of 46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.