Laserfiche WebLink
As the 2009 survey on file is incorrect, my assumption is that the hardcover calculations by the new <br /> homeowners and those refiected on the public hearing notice sent by the City of Orono are also <br /> incorrect. <br /> I have multiple concerns regarding the construction of the proposed garage as I am most directly affected by <br /> the construction of this building. My concerns are as follows: <br /> 1. The proposed plan infringes on the setback from my property by seven feet(plan reflects a 3'setback <br /> where 10' is required.) <br /> 2. The size, height and proposed placement of the garage will significantly affect the natural light to my <br /> back yard and side yard. The sod and most of the plants will be negativety affected by the reduced sun <br /> exposure. A great number of plants within the ptanting beds along the property line and on the west <br /> side of my home will not thrive with little#o no sunlight caused by the structure. <br /> 3. Due to the overall size and height of the structure,sight lines from both the interior and exterior of my <br /> home will be significantly blocked. instead of looking at lake views from the dining room and living <br /> room areas within my home, I will be looking at a garage roof. Instead of looking at greenscapes when I <br /> am in my back yard, I will be looking at the side of a garage, a mere three feet from my property line. <br /> 4. The construction of the proposed garage will damage the root system of the twin maple tree that sits at <br /> the corner of the building site thus jeopardizing the overall heaith and possible demise of the tree. <br /> I do not begrudge anyone a garage especially in Minnesota's harsh climate as wefl as the need to store outdoor- <br /> use items. However,the size of the structure that is proposed is extremely excessive as it relates to the size of <br /> the lot and the amount of allowed hardscape. <br /> Ten years ago when I tore down my old house and built the existing structure, it was hammered into me that <br /> Orono is concerned with the integrity of the lakes and the surrounding lands. I was not allowed to retain any <br /> existing hardscape on the property when I built my new home and had to strictly adhere the 10'side setbacks <br /> and maintain as much footage from the creek as possible. <br /> My suggestion would be: <br /> • Reduce the size of the proposed structure by half and ensure that a minimum 10'setback is adhered to <br /> vs the 3' requested setback. <br /> • Move the structure as far to the north as or close to the home as possible to preserve the integrity of the <br /> creek and all neighbors' lake and nature views. <br /> • Reduce the height of the structure so as to not block any lake views or natural light into my home. <br /> Respectfully, <br /> �Q������� <br /> Rebecca L. Holzem <br /> Photo Attachments: <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br />