My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-21-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
09-21-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:25 PM
Creation date
1/13/2016 8:59:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
418
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
, 'R , <br /> iii. It would be dangeraus maneuvering trucks. <br /> b. 30'-60'Wide Corridor <br /> i. Substantial impact with over 60 trees to be removed <br /> ii. Cut hill down moving substantia!yards of dirt <br /> c. Erosion Problems/potential-with tree's and vegetation being removed on steep slopes <br /> of which some are at 2U%to 3096 range. (see attached diagram showing the grading <br /> limits and route. <br /> Additional—Docking <br /> Also new on the pre[irninary plat are 3 outlots for docks. The outlots are sintilar to what was <br /> approved forthe Green Trees neighborhood—the difference being that each outlot wauld <br /> exceed 200'versus 100'width in Green Trees. The objecti�e of adding slips aiong Smith Bay is <br /> to provide access from boats that cannot get under the bridge at Tanager Lake, There wouldn't <br /> be any parking or vehicfes allowed as the new docks would be accessed only by water—new <br /> residents wfluld take their smaller boat from Tanager to their larger boat on Smith Bay. <br /> Contractar Concerns <br /> Dobozinsky and Sons has safety concerns particularly in poor weather with trucks and grading <br /> eq uipment. <br /> Cement trucks would have difficulty getting to the new cul-de-sac even at a 10% slope. <br /> Summation of Kev Impacts to the Property <br /> I. Main access off of a county road. <br /> 2. Poor si#e distance and visibility from the east and the west. <br /> 3. Gated entry rr�ay restrict vehicle size that may get through. <br /> 4. 180a'of new temporary access versus 300' corning from Heritage Lane. <br /> 5. Grading Impact—to attain a 1096 slope it would require 40'-60'wide destruction of large <br /> basswootfs. Cut/fill would destroy the natural bufFer between the existing hpme and the <br /> proposed lots. <br /> 6. Be totally against the City of Orono's purpose of the Conservation Design Protection. <br /> "Preservation and the enhancement of the rurai character of the City of Orono—"Preservation <br /> of wetlands,woodlands and wildlife habitat. <br /> 7. Destroy one of the legacy properties in Orono. <br /> 8. Drawings will show areas that would be affected. <br /> Proposed campromise with neighborhood-We empathize with the neighbors cancerns of disruption of <br /> the neighborhood during construction of the new street,cul de sac and homes to be built. <br /> Even though it is not a requirement of the platting process the lacob's family would like ta propose the <br /> following: <br /> 1. Create a parking area on site for a!)construction veF�icles. No parking on Heritage Lane. We will <br /> provide signage at the entrance of the subdivision to remind all of the contractors. <br /> 2. Restrict construction hours during the week . Example:(8:OOam to 4;30pm) instead af 7:OOam to <br /> 7:OOpm.Signage woulc! also be placed at the entrance of the subdivision. <br /> 3. Provide street clea�ing at the end of the clay for the existing culdesac. <br /> Please let me kreaw if you have any questians or if 1 have missed anything in this surnmary. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.