Laserfiche WebLink
t � R <br /> 15-3774 <br /> September 17,2015 <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br /> Dockage Outlots. Applicant has revised the preliminary plat drawing to show 3 nazrow lakeshrne <br /> 4�tlots south of Shoreline Drive for potential boat dockage. The actual future use of these outlots <br /> would require a separate approval process from the city and LMCD. The in,tent of their creat,ion <br /> is to allow each of the three new lats an option to have boat storage on the main lake(Smith's Bay) <br /> for boats that would not be able to pass under the Tanager Lake bridge. <br /> Construction Access.With regard to the Foxhill neighborhood concerns about construction access, <br /> applicant's engincer is in the pmcess of depicting the fill corridor that would be �required to <br /> establish a temporary construction access driveway from the south, based on maintaining a <br /> maximum grade of 1Q percent. City staff includi.ng the City Engineer beli,eve that bssed on the <br /> information submitted to date it is feasible to construct such a corridor in a relatively straight line <br /> at a grade of 10-11%, which might be difficult but perhaps not impossible for concrete trucks and <br /> dump trucks to traverse (see Eahibit A-3, comments from Doboszenski & Sons}. Establishment <br /> of a fiwctional access road will have impacts of tree removal and topographic changes that <br /> applicant is planni.ng to depict on additional submittals as of this wri#ing. However, the actual <br /> impacts of such a routing extend past the irnmediate area that is filled or cut to establish that <br /> temporary road. Applicant has provided an analysis of the potential negative impacts, which <br /> include poor access configuration and �isibility at Shoreiine Drive, and impacts to existing <br /> buildings, driveway and landscaping of the Jacobs property as well as dangerous lazge vehicle <br /> maneuverability. <br /> From�a staffperspective, while a temporary access is possible, it is not the preferred access. Use <br /> of Heritage Lane for construction access is preferred, and applicant has suggested three <br /> construction operation parameters to lianit the impact on the neighborhood: <br /> 1. Create a pazking azea on the properry for all construction vehicles, to eliminate parking on <br /> Heritage Lane, with signage placed to notify all coirtractors. <br /> 2. Re�tnicting construction hours; the actual times when constructian would be atlowed is up <br /> for discussion. City Code construction activity hours are limited as follows: <br /> Weekdays: 7:00 a.m.to $:00 p.m <br /> Weekends and Holidays: 8;40 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. <br /> Applicant is suggesting weekday const.ruction activity be limited to 8:00 a.ra. to 4:30 p.m. <br /> He has not indicated any suggested times for weekend construction activity. <br /> 3. Sfieet cleaning on a daily basis. <br /> Staf�'Recommendation <br /> Planning Commission should review the newly submitted materials and discuss remaining issues <br /> of concern. Re-open the Public Hearing and receive additionai comments from the public. <br /> If Pianning Commission detertnines that atl issues have been or will be suitably addressod, a <br /> recommendation for approval would be appropriate. If cei�tain issues remain unresolved,an option <br /> would be to forwazd the appiication to Council subj ect to applic�t addressing the noted items <br /> p�riior to Council review of the preliminary plat. <br /> Qptions for action include: <br /> - Recommend approval or conditional approval for the preliminary plat. <br /> - Table for revisions or further inforntation (provide applicant direction; tabling is not <br /> recommended due to the 120-day review}3eriod limitation). <br /> - Recommend denial, stating reasons. <br /> - Other <br />