Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE � <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,July 20,2015 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> The survey depicts seven lots, each meeting the minimum area requirements. Lots 1, 2, 3, and 7 meet the <br /> 200-foot width requirement as measured at the 50-foot front setback line. Lots 4, 5, and 6 are cul-de-sac <br /> lots that widen out to 200 feet fizrther from the front lot,with proposed house locations established to <br /> meet the required 30-foot side setbacks. These cul-de-sac lots technically require a lot width variance. <br /> The proposed single-family development is consistent with existing development in the surrounding <br /> neighborhood. Similar single-family lots with 2-plus acre lot sizes exist to the north,while the lots within <br /> Kintyre Two to the immediate south range from 1.4 to 3-plus acres. <br /> The portion of the property contained within the delineated boundary of the northeasterly wetland is <br /> within the Shoreland Overlay District but not within the defined Water Quality Overlay District and is <br /> therefore not subject to hardcover regulations. Each lot appears to have a suitable building site meeting <br /> the minimum front, side, side street, and rear setbacks of the RR-1 B District. <br /> The developer is advised that unless site grading to create individual house building pads as part of the <br /> subdivision improvements is proposed,the existing grades for measuring building heights and number of <br /> stories will be the grades that exist today. Raised pads that are created must be acknowledged in the <br /> development approval stage as creating"new existing grades." <br /> Gaffron stated Staff's report provides the lot layout and lot standards for each proposed lot. <br /> The City Engineer has provided a number of general and detailed comments which the developer will be <br /> required to address as the preliminary plat and final plat move forward. The original drawings depict a <br /> 50-foot buffer that is expected to be required by the Watershed District. Because the wetlands to the <br /> northeast and northwest are preserve classification wetland, they will require a 75-foot buffer, which will <br /> reduce the area of certain lots. <br /> Gaffron pointed out the 75-foot buffers versus the 50-foot buffers. The applicant is proposing septic sites <br /> that are located completely within the buffer and every one meets the 50-foot setback but not the 75-foot <br /> setback. Gaffron indicated he has a call in to the Watershed District to ensure they do not have an issue <br /> with septic sites located into their buffer area. Gaffron noted Lot 7 has exactly 2.12 acres of dry buildable <br /> and 0.44 acre of wetland. The alternate septic site appears to encroach within 40 feet of the wetland <br /> where a 75-foot setback is required,plus a 10-foot additional setback required by the City. <br /> A 24-foot road is proposed to match Kintyre Lane. At the time of the Kintyre development,the City <br /> granted a variance to allow Kintyre to be 24 feet width rather than the standard 28 feet. The Planning <br /> Commission should discuss whether the proposed road should be built to a different standard than <br /> Kintyre. Gaffron stated an argument can be made both ways but that a narrower road would allow the <br /> developer to preserve the trees located by the existing house. Gaffron stated the City Engineer will need <br /> to look at the narrower road width to see whether he has any concerns. <br /> The road extending all the way from Watertown Road is approximately 150 feet. The City's Code <br /> standard for a private road with a cul-de-sac is no more than ten lots and no more than 1,000 feet in <br /> length. Gaffron noted the City does have a number of private roads that extend well beyond 1,000 feet <br /> and that it has been City policy to establish corridors for possible future development of through roads <br /> where that ability exists. Gaffron indicated the Fire Marshal will need to take a look at the proposed road <br /> width and layout. <br /> Page 4 of 25 <br />