My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-17-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
08-17-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2016 1:59:36 PM
Creation date
1/12/2016 1:58:54 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
343
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
15-3733 <br /> 11 August 2015 <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any <br /> conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact <br /> created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this <br /> chapter in the district where such land is located. <br /> Practical Difficulties Statement <br /> Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and <br /> should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> Practical Difficulties Analysis <br /> Staff finds that the "land locked" condition of the property; the location of the existing driveway <br /> access point and home; and the proximity of the wetland to the driveway and home create practical <br /> difficulties making development of the property challenging. The applicanYs proposal to construct a <br /> driveway to serve the new addition within the wetland setback will not extend closer to the wetland <br /> than the existing driveway. It does not appear construction of the new driveway will adversely <br /> affect the stormwater storage and drainage on the property. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the <br /> property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official controf? <br /> 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance, if granted, will not alter the <br /> essential character of the neighborhood? <br /> 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the <br /> impacts created by the granting of the requested variance such as the addition of <br /> wetland buffer vegetation between the proposed (and existing) driveway to allow more <br /> infiltration opportunities? <br /> 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Planning Staff Recommendation <br /> Planning Staff recommends approval of the wetland setback variance to allow construction of the <br /> driveway with the following conditions: <br /> 1. Applicant shall comply with all of the permitting requirements of the MCWD—specifically <br /> the wetland, erosion control, and floodplain alteration rules. <br /> 2. Applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the City Engineer upon submittal of <br /> the application for a building permit for the new addition. <br /> 3. Applicant shall enter into an encroachment agreement with the City to addresses the <br /> existing and proposed improvements within the sewer easement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.