Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE • <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,July 20,2015 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Barnhart stated the Park Commission is requesting a variance to allow construction of two split rail fences <br /> consisting of approximately 125 feet and 58 square feet of hardcover within the required 75-foot <br /> lakeshore yard at the end of Lydiard Avenue. The fences are intended to delineate the parking area from <br /> the beach area and the channel adjacent to the parking area. <br /> The Park Commission is proposing to remove 10 deteriorating wooden bollards that currently mark the <br /> boundary between the parking and beach areas with a more visually appealing split rail wooden fence. <br /> The fence will not be more than 42 inches tall and will include two horizontal rails. <br /> Lydiard Beach is not a platted lot and is an extension of Lydiard Avenue right-of-way. The right-of-way <br /> terminates at the water's edge. <br /> Barnhart noted that post cards were not mailed for the public hearing and that the public hearing will need <br /> to be held at the City Council level. <br /> Planning Staff recommends approval of the variances as proposed. <br /> Schoenzeit asked if this would be considered a fire lane. <br /> Barnhart stated it is a platted road,with a portion of it being paved and a portion being a dirt road. <br /> Thiesse expressed concern that the fence may not be strong enough to withstand potential vandalism. <br /> Thiesse moved, Schwingler seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 15-3753, City of <br /> Orono Park Commission,Lydiard Beach swim area, granting of a hardcover variance and a lake <br /> setback variance. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> 6. #15-3754 CITY OF ORONO,AMEND CITY CODE REGARDING APPLICATION <br /> APPROVAL EXTENSIONS,8:27 P.M.—8:37 P.M. <br /> Barnhart stated the City Council had identified a need for some guidance in terms of an ordinance <br /> amendment that limited or at least defined the number of extensions associated with a preliminary plat. In <br /> a review of the ordinance by Staff, it was found that the ordinance does have criteria in terms of when <br /> activity must be completed or at least commenced with regard to variances, site plans, and conditional use <br /> permits, but nothing specific on preliminary plats. As it concerns to variances, site plans, or conditional <br /> use permit, the property owner or builder has to affect the changes or make progress on the building <br /> permit within a year or obtain an extension. <br /> Barnhart stated the City has had some situations where the preliminary plat has been extended up to five <br /> to seven times and the City Council felt there should be a level of discussion on what the appropriate <br /> number of extensions is. Barnhart noted five extensions would mean the application is five years past the <br /> public hearing and that property ownership could change in the neighborhood or other issues raised. <br /> Barnhart stated the draft ordinance is intended to help address the concern raised by the City Council. <br /> Barnhart stated there is no magic number but that Staff chose a four-year extension, which should allow <br /> the project to be completed in a timely manner. <br /> Page 18 of 25 <br />