My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-17-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
08-17-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2016 1:59:36 PM
Creation date
1/12/2016 1:58:54 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
343
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,July 20,2015 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> occasional maintenance vehicle using Dickey Lake Drive and Pine Ridge Lane to access the well <br /> building. A new driveway will be constructed extending from Pine Road Lane to the well house. <br /> Schoenzeit asked if the piece of property being required is large enough to accommodate a third well. <br /> City Engineer Edwards stated there is currently no requirement for a third well,but that the City would <br /> require a 110-foot x 110-foot square piece of ground in order to install another well. Edwards indicated <br /> by going further north,the City could potentially add a third well. <br /> Schoenzeit stated as long as the City is going through this effort, he would make sure that there is ample <br /> room for a third well. <br /> Edwards stated the north/south lot line is 110 feet from the other property line,which gives the City what <br /> they need. <br /> Acting Chair Landgraver opened the public hearing at 8:12 p.m. <br /> Hank Radintz, 720 Dickey Lake Drive, stated with changing the zoning for this parcel, his concern is that <br /> it would not be eligible for multiple residential development. <br /> Gaffron stated the RR-lA district is a single-family zone and does have provisions that would allow <br /> someone to construct a two-family dwelling as a conditional use permit. If the property owners propose <br /> to take this home down, since it would now be a 1.6 acre parcel,proposing a duplex would be a <br /> conditional use permit and a public hearing would be required. <br /> Thiesse asked if they can remove that designation from this lot,which would preclude someone from <br /> constructing a duplex. <br /> Gaffron stated if it is not rezoned, it would be left as RR-1 B. Gaffron stated there are no other options <br /> for rezoning. <br /> Thiesse asked if it can be rezoned with conditions. <br /> Gaffron stated not to his knowledge but that the City Attorney would need to review that. Gaffron stated <br /> once it is rezoned to RR-lA, it would have all the opportunities that district would allow. Gaffron stated <br /> he is not sure the purchase agreement would go through if it is not rezoned to RR-lA <br /> Radintz indicated currently he has been using his half for parking his trailer. Radintz stated the public <br /> portion of Pine Ridge Lane has not been maintained or plowed in the wintertime by the City but that he or <br /> the Ottens would occasionally plow it. Radintz stated it sounds like there will be daily traffic, which will <br /> entail winter plowing and that he wants to make sure he does not get plowed in on his half of the vacated <br /> property. <br /> Edwards stated that would become the access into the well house,which would require at least daily visits <br /> by Public Works staff to conduct water testing and normal maintenance, so year-round access would need <br /> to be maintained and that section would be plowed. Edwards indicated the City will try not to plow him <br /> in or cause access issues. <br /> Page 16 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.