08-17-2015 Planning Commission Packet

Home Browse Search

#15-3771 13 August 2015 Page 5 of 5 should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds that the setback limitations on the property create practical difficulties in identifying viable expansion opportunities. The applicant has provided a relatively low impact solution to the stated living space challenges which does not result in an expansion of structural coverage or of hardcover. The affected neighbor's views of the lake are currently impacted by the applicant's existing entry stair system; and with a one story house they will likely not have views of the lake impacted by the applicant's proposed bathroom addition. This application is not entirely unlike the recent variance application for 1990 Shadywood Road (#15-3750)where additions lakeward of the average and lake setbacks,though above the existing footprint, were not supported. The difference here is that the lot is smaller, and there may be fewer options to move to the side. Public Comments Staff received acknowledgement and support of the applicant's project. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Commission options for consideration The Planning Commission may support, support with conditions, or recommend denial of the application. Reasons for denial should be provided to the Council.