My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-20-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
07-20-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2020 8:43:11 AM
Creation date
1/12/2016 1:34:15 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
373
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A <br /> MINUTES OF THE ' <br /> ORONO PLANNWG COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,June 15,2015 <br /> 6:30 dclock p.m. <br /> Hiller requested the Planning Commission table his application. Hiller questioned whether the neighbors <br /> will accept something other than 30 feet, and stated that if they are required to build within the allowable <br /> footprint, the neighbors may not like the appearance of the house. <br /> Leskinen stated it may not be something that can be negotiated with the neighbors,but that there are <br /> parameters that the Planning Commission needs to approve an application, such as a practical difficulty. <br /> Leskinen noted the Council may prefer to deny it. <br /> Hiller asked if they are allowed to change the request in front of the Council. <br /> Curtis stated the Council will want something that is representative of what was discussed at the public <br /> hearing. Curtis stated if the applicant follows the direction of the Planning Commission, they likely <br /> would be fine with that, but if the applicant brought back something totally different than what was <br /> contemplated tonight, they might elect to send it back to the Planning Commission. <br /> Hiller asked whether the Planning Commission could vote on it tonight and whether he could then bring a <br /> revised plan before the City Council for something less than 30/30. <br /> Curtis indicated he could. <br /> Leskinen noted a motion and a second have been made to deny the application. <br /> Thiesse stated in his view a practical difficulty is attempting to fit in the neighborhood but the neighbors <br /> do not have setbacks that fit the lots that they have. Thiesse stated the applicant is the new guy in the <br /> neighborhood and this is a clean sheet, but that in his opinion the rest of the neighbors are not showing <br /> that they conform either. <br /> VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br /> 14. #15-3743 IRWIN JACOBS, 1700 SHORELINE DRIVE, SKETCH PLAN REVIEW, <br /> 11:45 P.M.— 12:02 P.M. <br /> Page 66 of 79 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.