My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-20-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
07-20-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2020 8:43:11 AM
Creation date
1/12/2016 1:34:15 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
373
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ' <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,June 15,2015 <br /> 6:30 dclock p.m. <br /> Schoenzeit noted that would still be considered structure. <br /> VonFeldt stated he just wanted to make sure it was clear that it was not the house that was sticking out <br /> that far. <br /> Leskinen stated she does not mind the bump out portion or the square deck on the bottom, but that the top <br /> portion is the issue. Leskinen stated she would rather see what is being proposed than a big massive wall, <br /> but that she is not sure the Planning Commission has the grounds to approve it. <br /> Landgraver stated there is a single-story on one side and a two-story box on the other. Landgraver stated <br /> in terms of massing, he is not sure it is in character with the neighborhood. <br /> Lemke asked if there is any benefit to tabling the application. <br /> VonFeldt stated he does not want to table it if the Planning Commission is thinking about approving it. <br /> Landgraver stated the City has a hard line about adding more structure in the 0-75-foot zone. <br /> Thiesse noted even if the Planning Commission denies his application, he can still go before the City <br /> Council. <br /> Landgraver stated the Plaruiing Commission could table it for redesign,but that he does not want the <br /> applicant to think that if he does redesign it, that it will necessarily be approved. <br /> Thiesse asked if the rectangle is only the second-story deck. <br /> Curtis stated the red-hashed marks on the south side of the house depict the part that is being <br /> recommended for denial and is the deck. <br /> VonFeldt stated the first floor is the landing coming out of the patio doors and down a set of stairs. The <br /> second floor is just above that. <br /> Page 58 of 79 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.