My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-20-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
07-20-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2020 8:43:11 AM
Creation date
1/12/2016 1:34:15 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
373
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
t y <br /> FILE#15-3766 <br /> 20 Jufy 2015 <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> approval may be granted at the discretion of the planning director provided no lake <br /> views of an adjacent/akeshore lot are obstructed and adjacent neighbors provide <br /> written approval. <br /> It is staff's understanding that the Planning Commission in January felt the language adequately <br /> serves the majority of situations encountered and did not recommend any changes to the <br /> zoning code. <br /> While no changes were suggested, staff wanted to confirm practice in certain unique situations, <br /> and codify this practice. <br /> Current practice. Please refer to the attached schematic (Exhibit B). In situations where <br /> construction is proposed on a lot(Lot B)where a house is standing on one side (Lot A), and the <br /> lot on the other side is either vacant or right of way(Lot C), the average lake shore setback, in <br /> practice, is the distance the standing house is from the OHWL. There is no straight-line drawn <br /> because there is no neighboring residential structure. <br /> In effect,the neighbor on Lot A alone creates a new setback that is greater than the 75' lake <br /> yard. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Does the Planning Commission agree with the method of determining average lakeshore <br /> for lots adjacent to vacant/ROW property? <br /> 2. If not, what concerns of the Commission should be addressed? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.