My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-20-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
07-20-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2020 8:43:11 AM
Creation date
1/12/2016 1:34:15 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
373
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
,� <br /> MINUTES OF THE ' <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,June 15,2015 <br /> 6:30 dclock p.m. <br /> Curtis noted she received a letter from the neighbor to the south across the street,which has been <br /> provided to the Planning Commissioners, as well as a brief e-mail communication from the neighbor to <br /> the north. The neighbor to the north also left a voice inail regarding the proposal since she was unable to <br /> attend tonight's meeting. <br /> Curtis played a voice message from Marsha Rokke, 180 Orono Orchard Road. Rokke stated she just <br /> found out about the project and that they have been out of town since June 3 and will not be returning <br /> until late Monday evening. Rokke stated she would appreciate if nothing is decided Monday night until <br /> they can provide some input. <br /> Rokke indicated she was told by her neighbor that this project would really affect their property, which is <br /> adjacent to 190 Orono Orchard Road. Rokke stated the variance that is being requested seems <br /> extraordinary to her and is way over and above what he should be able to build. Rokke stated they are not <br /> opposed to a building on this site but that they have concerns about the wetlands and the setbacks. <br /> Rokke requested that the application not be approved tonight so they have an opportunity to review the <br /> plans. Rokke stated they have received no notification of the project that they are aware of other than <br /> their neighbor calling them. <br /> Curtis noted the applicant is present tonight and that she has the plans and pictures of the property as it <br /> exists today. <br /> Lemke asked when the notice cards were mailed out. <br /> Curtis indicated they were mailed June 5. <br /> Leskinen asked if the correspondence from the other neighbor is based on the old driveway location. <br /> Curtis indicated that neighbor did not have the benefit of the revised plan since it was only submitted <br /> today but that she is present tonight. <br /> Page 32 of 79 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.