My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-20-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
07-20-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2020 8:43:11 AM
Creation date
1/12/2016 1:34:15 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
373
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� ` MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,June 15,2015 <br /> 6:30 dclock p.m. <br /> McGrann asked what options the Planning Commission has. <br /> Landgraver stated it would either require a 30-foot setback or require a variance application. <br /> Leskinen stated it would be easier to move the line than the building. Leskinen stated since this is a new <br /> lot,the City would not be willing to create a substandard lot, and that the size of the building could either <br /> be reduced or the line changed. <br /> Schoenzeit noted it will be a much sharper angle. Schoenzeit asked if the lot line rearrangement would <br /> impact the septic site. <br /> Barnhart stated if the line is shifted over 15 feet to the north, it would not really impact the septic site in <br /> terms of serving the lot to the north. If the line is shifted to the other side of the septic system, that lot <br /> would become too small. <br /> Landgraver asked where the line would intersect on the right-hand side. Landgraver asked if that is a <br /> wetland in that area. <br /> Barnhart illustrated on the overhead where the line would be. <br /> Thiesse asked if the City has any criteria about a newly created lot having an old septic site. <br /> Barnhart stated the City has a report on the septic system and the septic inspector is comfortable with that <br /> report. <br /> Schoenzeit stated the other issue is the trail easement and that it is the practice of the City to collect those <br /> at the time of new subdivisions. <br /> Leskinen stated it appears the Planning Commission is in agreement that the line should be changed and <br /> that a trail easement should be obtained. <br /> Page 29 of 79 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.