Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#15-3753 <br /> 20 July 2015 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET <br /> The subject property is not a platted lot; it is an extension of Lydiard Avenue Right of Way <br /> (ROW). The ROW terminates at the water's edge. There are minimum requirements for platted <br /> lots; as the ROW is used for public purposes, these minimums do not appiy. <br /> Section 78-1405 (a)8-Non-encroachments: <br /> LR-16 DISTRICT Required Proposed <br /> Lakeshore fences 75' 25' <br /> The ordinance requires a setback of 75 feet from the Ordinary High Water Line for all fences. <br /> Split rail fences are permissible in required front yards, due to their open, rural character. <br /> However, this exception does not apply to lake yards. <br /> Section 78-1680 and 78-1700-Hardcover Calculations: <br /> The extension of Lydiard, forming the beach and parking area, is within Tier 1, which maximizes <br /> hard cover to 25%of the gross lot area. The existing improvements on the property, including <br /> the long gravel drive and parking area exceed the hard cover 25% maximum. <br /> The existing bollards create approximately 4.4 sq ft of hard cover(8" x 8" post multiplied by 10 <br /> posts). The hardcover associated with the proposed improvements will be 62.5 sq ft (125 feet of <br /> fence x 6 inches of width)for an increase of 58 square feet <br /> Applicable Regulation:Variance (Section 78-123) <br /> In reviewing applications for variance, the P/anning Commission shall consider the effect of the <br /> proposed variance upon the health, safety and we/fare of the community, existing and <br /> anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect <br /> on values of property in the surrounding area. The P/anning Commission shall consider <br /> recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances <br /> where their strict enforcement would cause practica/difficulties because of circumstances unique <br /> ro the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is <br /> demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning <br /> Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties <br /> atso include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. <br /> Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, <br /> subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a <br /> variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the <br /> affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary <br /> use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. <br /> According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: <br /> 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The <br /> intent of the ordinance is to maintain a rural, natural character adjacent to the lake. <br /> The Planning Commission should discuss if a split rail fence provides a consistent <br /> character. <br /> 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The global intent of the <br /> Comprehensive Plan is to maintain a certain character of the City, while establishing <br />