Laserfiche WebLink
i y ' <br /> 15-3739 <br /> June 10 2015 <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> undergoes Council review. Additionally, wetland boundaries must be confirmed prior to <br /> Council review. <br /> 2. The revisions to the plan, especially the removal of one of the Big Woods lots, would appear <br /> to be a very positive step. Is this change sufficient to a11ow Plantfing Cornmission to support <br /> the application? Are there any additional changes that Planning Comrnission desires? <br /> 3. Are there any negative impacts related to adding a lot (Lot 3, Block 2) along Huntet Drive <br /> that wi�ll need to be mitigated? Shoutd additional screening of that lot be required, given the <br /> probable location of the house in the open field 250' east of Hunter Drive? <br /> 4. Are the proposed design and preservation measures as proposed in the draft Covenant <br /> Docutnent and its exhibits adequate to protect the site environmental elements of <br /> importance? Is the applicant willing to grant to the City conservation ea.sements within <br /> individual lots to ailow for a greatex level of protection than simply HOA covenants7 <br /> 5. Has the applicant adequately addressed the requests for additional information as noted ini the <br /> Notice of Planning Commission Action(Ea�hibit I�? <br /> 6. Axe there any other concerz�s that need to be addressed? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> 1. Applicant should be advised that further review by the City Engineer may result in <br /> additional items needing to be addressed. <br /> 2. Applicant should address the potential conflicts between septic sites and dr�iveways prior to <br /> Council review. <br /> 3. Preliminary plat review by the City Council shouid not move forward untiUunless <br /> documentation is provided confirming that the MCWD has approved the wetland <br /> delineation boundaries. <br /> Planzxzng Commission should re-open the Public Hearing and receive comments from the public. <br /> Discussion of the above issues and any conclusions reached by the Planning Commission should <br /> provide applicant and staff with direction as to whether any further revisions to the proposed plat <br /> may be warranted. <br /> - Table for further revxsions and consideraxion(provide applicant direction). <br /> -Recommend approval or conditional approval for the preliminary plat. <br /> - Recommend denial, stating reasons. <br /> - Other <br />