Laserfiche WebLink
� ;� . <br /> 15-3739 <br /> June 10 2015 <br /> Aa9e2of4 <br /> SUBTOTALS �6.42 �34,42 �34.42 �40.44 <br /> Outlot A-Undeveloped ��� <br /> Outlot B-�#��� Tennis Court S,�g Z,q� <br /> Outlot C-� Undeveloged �814.87 <br /> �utlot D-�� Private Road �9 0.75 <br /> Outtot E-Private Road �1.73 <br /> Outlot F-Private Driveway ��28 <br /> � � <br /> 8�: <br /> Undeveloped Oatlots A&C:44.46 ac. Road&Tennis Ontlots:4.23 xc. OUTLOTS SUBTOTAL 4g.(9 <br /> Total Acres gg,�3* <br /> *Does not equa!89.49 due to rounding <br /> Proposed Overall Density: i 1 lots on 34.42 dry acres=4.32 units per acre <br /> Average Dry Acres per Lot: 3.13 dry acres per lot <br /> List of Eahibits <br /> ExhibitA. Revised Preliminary Plat Drawings dated 6/U15 <br /> 1 -Overall Prelinnir�ary Plat <br /> 2-North Detail <br /> 3 - South Detail <br /> 4-Preliminary R�ad Plan <br /> Exhibit B. Submitted PIan Maiifications Narrative <br /> Exhibit C. Submitted Outlot&Lot Acreages Narrative <br /> Ezhibit D. Submitted Tree Loss Analysis <br /> Exhibit E. Revised Draft Covenants <br /> Exhibit F. Revised Covenant E�chibits(Coloz Sketches E�ch.A and Exh.B) <br /> Exhibit G. Septic Testing Excerpts for New Lot 3 Block 2 <br /> Exhibit H. Notice of Planning Commission Action <br /> F�hibit I. Draft Minutes of May 1$ PC Meeting <br /> Exhibit.l. Wetland Delineation Approval Status Documents <br /> Exhibit K Developer Response to City En�ineez Comments re: Conservation Design Report <br /> Exhibit L. Selected Elchibits from May 18 PC Packet <br /> Revised Plan Submitted <br /> This application was tabled ai�er its initial review and public hearing at the May 18 Planning <br /> Commission meeting. Draft minutes of that meeting aze attached, as well as the Notice of <br /> Planning Commission Action which advised the applicant to: <br /> - introduce more formal covenant or easement I.anguage, depictions and specificity regarding <br /> the proposed non-buildable areas within imdividual lots; identify with clarity the specific <br /> building zones within each of the wooded lots; and better document the limitations placed <br /> on future property owners regazding clearcutting; and <br /> - provide more detail regarding the future intent for preservation of the prairie areas. <br />