Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#15-3746 <br /> 9 June 2015 <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> Practical Difficultles Analysis <br /> Staff finds practical difficulties exist to s�pport redevelopment of this property, such as the <br /> substandard lot area and width are not the result of actions by the landowner; the appiicant is <br /> proposing to construct a new single family home which is reasonable and consistent with the <br /> comprehensive plan. The hardcover and structural coverage proposed meet the requirements <br /> of the Zoning code. Granting rear and side setback variances in addition to the lot area and lot <br /> width variances to rede�elop this property wifl not merely serve as a convenience to the <br /> applicant. The proposed home and setbacks appear to be consistent with the goals of the <br /> comprehensive plan; fit the character of the neighborhaod; and do not appear to adversely <br /> impact adjacent properties. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the <br /> subject property in a reasonabfe manner which is not permitted by an official <br /> control? Are the proposed setbacks reasonable? <br /> 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variances, if granted, will not alter the <br /> essential character of the neighborhaod? <br /> 3. Does the Commission find it necessary ta impose conditions in order ta mitigate the <br /> impacts created by the granting of the requested variances? <br /> 4. Are the�e any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Planning Staff recommends approval of the requested lot area, lot width, side setback and rear <br /> setback variances in orderto redevelop the subject property. <br />