My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-15-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
06-15-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2016 11:49:25 AM
Creation date
1/12/2016 11:47:11 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
612
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE#15-3746 <br /> 9 June 2015 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> The City's Engineer has re�iewed the plans and faund no insurmountable issues with the <br /> proposal; an in depth review will be conducted at the time af the buiiding permft. <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> LOT ANALYSIS WtJRSHEET <br /> Lot Area/Width: <br /> RR-1B Lot Area Lot Width <br /> Required 87,120 s.f. (2 acres) 200' <br /> Actual 10,500 s.f. (0.24 acre) 75' <br /> Setbacks: <br /> RR-1B Required Proposed <br /> I Front 50' S7.6' <br /> Rear 50' 31.5' <br /> North Side 30' 10.3' <br /> South Side 30' 13.2' <br /> Structural Covera�e: <br /> Total Lot Area 7otal Strurtural Coverage <br /> 10,500 s.f. (0.24 acre) Allowed: 1,575 s.f. (15%) <br /> Proposed: 1,477 s.f. (14�) <br /> Hardcover Calcutations: <br /> Stormwater <br /> Overlay District Total Area in Zone Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcaver <br /> Tier <br /> Tier 2 10,500 s.f. 3,150 s.f. 2,399 s.f. <br /> (30 9b) (22.896) <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> Lot Area/Lot�dth Variances <br /> Zoning Code Section 78-72 provides options for the redevelopment of lots which do not meet <br /> the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard <br /> properties within the Shoreland Overlay District, like the subject lot, are able to be redeveloped <br /> without variances if specific standards are met; such as: <br /> 1. All setback requirements can be met; <br /> 2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can <br /> be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer;and <br /> 3. The impervious surFace coverage meets afl hardcover location and square footage <br /> restrictions af this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed <br /> 25 percent of the entire lot area. <br /> 4. All other zoning district standards can be met. <br /> The applicant's property cannot conform to # 1 above therefore, lot area and width variances <br /> are required in order ta redevelop the property. Because the property is not subject to Section <br /> 78-72 the Tier 2 hardcover limitations can be applied. <br /> Setback Variances <br /> The small lot size and the 50- and 3D-foot required setbacks within the RR-B district result in a <br /> 15' x 40' buildable envelope. Setback variances are necessary in order to build a reasonably <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.