Laserfiche WebLink
15-3733 <br /> 9 June 2015 <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> alternative locations where an additional garage could be located on the property. Afthough the <br /> property width and area are nonconforming, the granting of a setback variance to permit a two- <br /> story addition to be located 15 feet f�om the side lot line where 30 feet is required is not consistent <br /> with the goals of the comprehensive pfan nor would it be in keeping with the intent of the Zoning <br /> Code. Based on the information provided it does not appear that the appticant has proven practical <br /> difficulties which support the granting af setback variance #o construct the addition ion the location <br /> proposed; nor has staff identified practical difficulties which support making a conforming setback <br /> nonconforming. <br /> Issues for Conslderation <br /> 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the owners propose to use the subject <br /> property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br /> 2. Does the Planning Cammission find that the variance, if granted, will not alter the <br /> essential character of the neighborhood? <br /> 3. Does the Commission flnd it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the <br /> impacts created by the granting of the requested variance? Vegetative screening frorn <br /> the lake or the neighboring property, etc? <br /> 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> In summary, Planning Staff recommends denial of the setback variance to permit the proposed two <br /> s#ory addrtion to be located 15.6 feet from the side lot line where a 30 foot setback is required. <br />