Laserfiche WebLink
, � <br /> " MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORON4 PLANNING COA�IlVIISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,May 18,ZO15 , <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. !� <br /> Stickn stated Exatn le 3 is in his covenants. In that exam le the ard s e is � � �� <br /> e3' p p , y pac 0.57 of an acre and that ` a`� <br /> someone will aot corr�e in and ask to clear out an acre or else they will spend$SQ,000 on traes if they do � <br /> that. Stickney stated that is why there is a strict tree preservation plan,which will protect against that. <br /> Lemice asked if the covenant would be a Iegal document. <br /> Sticlmey stated it is and that it would be filed with the property. Stickney stated every homeowner will <br /> see rt before they pwrchase the properiy and it vrill be filed at the time of final plat. <br /> Gaffron aslced who will be enforcing the covenant. <br /> Stickney indicated he would bo along with the homeawners association. <br /> Gaffran askad if the homeowners association ca�change those covenants in the future. <br /> Stickney stated ti�at is a good thought and that could be added. Sticlao;ey statad they would be hurting <br /> themselves if ti�ey did tha� <br /> Schoenzeit commented covenants typically fail the second time around. <br /> Gaffron asked i�£Mr. Stickney woufd be willing to put additaonal restrictions around the perimeters of <br /> spacific lots. Gaftron noted the development of the Laksview Golf Course does not allow development <br /> of acry sort to happen within certain conservation areas. Gaffron stated the concern here is thst there is a <br /> pote�ial for an individual homeowner to do something different than what is in the covenants,and that if <br /> the covenants can be changed at will wit�out input from the City, one of the ways to avoid that issue is to <br /> place a provision in the covenant to prevent that which would give the City some enforcement power. <br /> Stickney noted his covanants on Lot 5 prevent buildi.ng in the existing�ee azea. Stickney stated he could <br /> bring to the Cauncil the general building zones for Lots 1,Z, 6, and 7. <br /> Gaf�ion noted he did something similar to tha#on Graham Hiil,and that lae is suggesting it might be <br /> appropriate in this case. <br /> Stickney stated he is protecting the trees,which was the intent of the covena�t, and tt�at he would need <br /> some flexibility in the hause pads if that provision is included. Stickney noted he has reduced the <br /> building areas since he first proposed the sketch plan. <br /> Landgraver sta�ed i�£the covenants can be changed by a majority vote of the homeowners at a future date, <br /> making it spacific to ea.ch lat would carry a lot of weight <br /> Sticlrney stated in the Big Woods area that would make sense. <br /> Landgraver noted the trees will be relevant to some of the properties and the other praperty owners may <br /> choose ta change that� Landgraver sta#ed nobody wants the trees cut down, so incorporating it in at the <br /> lot level makes a whole lot of sense. <br /> Stickney stated he is all ears and that�t sounds like a good plan. <br /> Page 20 of 37 <br />