My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-15-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
06-15-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2016 11:49:25 AM
Creation date
1/12/2016 11:47:11 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
612
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� NIINTJTES OF THE <br /> OR�NO PLANNING COD�VIISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,May 18,2015 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. �� <br /> The nlationship of this property to the surrounding developmeitt is consistent with the existing � <br /> ��� <br /> development in the surrounding neighborhood. Large singl�family lots surround this site on the north � <br /> snd east. The properties to the north are within d�e City of Medina and the properties to the east are <br /> located in the City of Plymouth. To the west and south,t�►e homes in Orono are generally on 2-plus acre <br /> lots. <br /> Gaffron stated there is aot city sewer available to this property and that private wells and septic systems <br /> are planned for this deve�opment. <br /> Gaffron noted Staff s report contains a brief description of each proposed lot along with tbe Applica�'s <br /> comments excerpted from the Conservation Design report. <br /> There are two praposed private toad corridors serving the proposed subdivision. Both are shown to be 50 <br /> feet in width. Both proposed roads are shown with a 100-foot dia�oaeter cu-de-sac as required by the <br /> Subdivision Ordinance and the CMP for a local private road. The standard paved width for the road in <br /> Outlots E and F would be 24 feet with an 80-foot diameter paved cul�de-sac. <br /> Praposed Lots 1 and 2,Block l,wiil be accessed off of Sixth Avenue North via a private road cont�ined <br /> within a 50-foot outlot Likewise, a 50-foot private raad outlot with cul-de-sac will provide ac�ess to <br /> Lots 3 through 7, Block 1,and Lo�s 1 and 2,Biock 2. Lots 1 $nd 2,Block 3,will have individual <br /> driveway access directly off ef H�mter Drive. The totaI lengti�of the rvad in autlot F is about 1,550 feet, <br /> which excceds the code staudsrd maximum length of 1,000 faet. The driveway to serve Lot 2,Block 2, <br /> adds an additiona1600 feet. The applicant has suggested that use of the existing roadbed is desi.red and <br /> the minimum width for the entire road s}ifluld be no less than 2a feet. <br /> The 30-foot access corridor shown for Lot 2,Block 1,would function as the access to the back lot. For <br /> Lot 2,Block 2,the acr.ess corridor has been widened to allow for flexibility in driveway placement to <br /> avoid tTee removaI. The City will require a mad,drainage and utilitias easement over the private roads. <br /> The CMP also proposes a future trail along County Road 6. As a result, an easement along tha roa.d for <br /> trail purposes should be e�lored. Development of the property would be subject to garlc dedication faes <br /> at approximately$5,550 per new lot. The total fee,excluding the one existing house,would be <br /> approxi.mately$56,000. <br /> The property is also subject to the stormwatex and draina.ge trunk fee for ten new lots. The City Council <br /> is expected to adopt an ordinance that revises the structure so that the applicant would likely be paying for <br /> ten lots at roughly$7,700 per lot for a total stormwater fee of agproximately$77,000. The lots will be <br /> served by private on-site sep�ic systems and private wells. Full soil testing and preliminary system <br /> designs have been completed for 5-bedroom homes, Final design for each site will be completed once the <br /> specific house sizes are lmown. <br /> The site contains a number of watlands. The applica�t should provide t�e City witi�evidence that the <br /> MCWD has approved tha wetland boundaries, and if any of the boundaries change, significant impacts to <br /> the plat layout could result. The MCWD will be involved 'vn establishment of mirigation reqwirements if <br /> needed and will also be eshablishing appropriate wetlaud buffers for the development. The Crty will <br /> require a Conservation and Flowage Easement over each of the wetlands as well as impose standard <br /> wetlat�d setback requirements. <br /> Page 9 of 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.