My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/17/2015 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
08/17/2015 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2016 10:38:13 AM
Creation date
1/12/2016 10:38:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,August 17,2015 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> 8. #15-3773 BILL BRUEGGEMAN ON BEHALF OF STEVE ELLIOT, 1400 BALDUR <br /> PARK ROAD,CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT,9:00 P.M.—9:10 P.M. <br /> Bill Brueggeman,Applicant, was present. <br /> Curtis stated the applicant is proposing to demolish the existing structure and construct a new single- <br /> family home on the property. The new home must be constructed to conform to all applicable laws and <br /> regulations. In order to conform to the floodplain regulation,the lowest floor of the home must be at or <br /> above the regulatory flood protection elevation(RFPE). The RFPE is one foot above the elevation of the <br /> one percent annual chance of flooding or the 100-year flood elevation and follows the 931.5 foot <br /> elevation contour. The RFPE for Lake Minnetonka is established at 932.5 feet. The Minnehaha Creek <br /> Watershed District requires an additional foot above the RFPE for all openings. The applicant's proposal <br /> contemplates cutting and filling within the property in order to elevate the proposed home to meet the <br /> floodplain regulations. <br /> Whenever floodplain filling is proposed,the DNR and MCWD regulations require the floodplain be <br /> expanded elsewhere so there is no decrease in flood storage capacity. The applicant is proposing equal <br /> mitigation for the impacts on the property. <br /> The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a conditional use permit as the use <br /> permit was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted, <br /> the City must find that the proposed use complies with the criteria outlined in the Code. Staff provided a <br /> conditional use permit analysis in the Staff report and the Planning Commission should discuss any of the <br /> criteria they feel is appropriate. <br /> In addition to the City's conditional use permit requirement for filling/grading below the one percent <br /> annual chance flood elevation,the activity is subject to a floodplain alteration permit governed by the <br /> MCWD. The applicant has submitted an application to the MCWD along with the required plans and <br /> engineering. The Watershed District is currently reviewing that application. Further,the City Engineer <br /> will assure that the permitting conditions ofthe MCWD are consistent with the 1-to-1 volume mitigation <br /> requirement of the FEMA floodplain regulations which the City enforces. Other than that,there are no <br /> specific additional requirements of the City's conditional use permit review. <br /> Staff recommends the Planning Commission hold the public hearing, allow any public comments and <br /> then make a recommendation to the Council. The applicant should be required to provide proof of an <br /> approved MCWD floodplain alteration permit prior to placement on the City Council's agenda for <br /> review. The grading plan would also be reviewed consistent with the City's building permit <br /> requirements. The proposed development of the property does meet all of the other zoning requirements. <br /> Landgraver asked if this has any impact or relationship with the road work that will be done on Baldur <br /> Park Road. <br /> Curtis stated the City Engineer is aware of this proposal and has been reviewing it. Curtis stated she is <br /> not sure how this relates to it. Curtis stated any construction that happens at the same time as the City's <br /> road project will need to be coordinated and the applicant is aware of that. <br /> Lemke asked if the cut and fill calculations were reviewed by the City Engineer. <br /> Page 25 of 43 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.